Optimizing prehospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction pathways, medical dispatch types and acute management times: A French regional registry study - 26/10/25
, Sahal Miganeh-Hadi a, Mathilde Borg b, Laura Cetran c, Florence Saillour-Glénisson a, d, Catherine Pradeau efor the REANIM group
Graphical abstract |
Highlights |
• | One-fifth of patients with STEMI missed the fastest pathway because of mistriage. |
• | Visiting the ED led to significant time loss, exceeding recommended times. |
• | Fibrinolysis should be reconsidered for those managed in non-PCI-capable hospitals. |
Abstract |
Background |
Efficient management of emergency medical services is crucial, particularly during dispatch, to direct patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to the fastest medical intensive care unit pathway, bypassing emergency departments (EDs) at hospitals capable and incapable of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A detailed analysis of emergency pathways may reveal key actions to improve patient care and outcomes.
Aim |
To describe the initial STEMI pathways, with a focus on dispatch management, acute management times and revascularization strategies for each pathway: medical intensive care unit; ED at PCI-capable hospital; and ED at PCI-incapable hospital.
Methods |
Multicentre retrospective study of all adult patients with STEMI diagnosed by emergency physicians within 24hours of symptom onset, and managed in any of the 19 medical intensive care units, seven PCI-capable hospitals and 25 PCI-incapable hospitals in the Aquitaine region from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2021. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who missed the fastest pathway because of mistriage. The secondary endpoints focused on time intervals from symptom onset to balloon inflation.
Results |
The study sample comprised 8344 patients: 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56–58%) followed the fastest pathway; and 21% (95% CI 20–22%) missed it because of mistriage. The median (interquartile range) time spent in the ED was 78 (48–150) minutes at PCI-capable hospitals and 109 (71–178) minutes at PCI-incapable hospitals. Only 11% (95% CI 10–12%) of patients managed in EDs at PCI-incapable hospitals received fibrinolysis, and 79% (95% CI 76–82%) exceeded the recommended 120minutes from first medical contact to balloon for the primary PCI strategy.
Conclusions |
These findings should prompt French policymakers to improve the accuracy of dispatch and develop specific STEMI networks in EDs. Time lost in EDs or because of mistriage represents a considerable loss of opportunity for patients. The role of fibrinolysis should be reconsidered.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Myocardial infarction, Emergency medical dispatch, Healthcare pathway, Access to care, Time to treatment
Esquema
Vol 118 - N° 10
P. 532-540 - octobre 2025 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
