Suscribirse

Allocation and prognosis of temporary mechanical circulatory support in unselected cardiogenic shock: Insights from the FRENSHOCK registry - 06/12/25

Doi : 10.1016/j.acvd.2025.10.331 
Stéphane Manzo-Silberman a, , Vincent Bataille b, c, Laurent Bonello d, e, f, François Roubille g, Bernard Levy h, Pascal Lim i, Guillaume Schurtz j, Philippe Letocart k, Karim Chaoui l, Vincent Probst m, Emile Ferrari n, o, Olivier Delhaye p, Raphael Favory q, Meyer Elbaz b, Edouard Gerbaud r, s, Eric Bonnefoy t, Etienne Puymirat u, Guillaume Leurent v, Clement Delmas b, w, x,
a Sorbonne University, Institute of Cardiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP–HP, ACTION Study Group, 75013 Paris, France 
b Fédération des Services de Cardiologie, CHU de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France 
c Association pour la Diffusion de la Médecine de Prévention, 31400 Toulouse, France 
d Aix-Marseille Université, 13385 Marseille, France 
e Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, 13385 Marseille, France 
f Mediterranean Association for Research and Studies in Cardiology (MARS Cardio), 13015 Marseille, France 
g PhyMedExp, Cardiology Department, Université de Montpellier, Inserm, CNRS, INI-CRT, CHU de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France 
h Medical Intensive Care Unit, Brasbois, CHU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France 
i Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, AP–HP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France 
j USIC Urgences, Centre Hémodynamique, Institut Cœur Poumon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Soins Intensifs de Cardiologie, CHU de Lille, University of Lille, Inserm U1167, 59000 Lille, France 
k Intensive Care Unit, CH Jacques-Puel, 12027 Rodez, France 
l Intensive Care Unit, CH de Cahors, 46000 Cahors, France 
m CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France 
n Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, 06001 Nice, France 
o Université de Nice Sofia Antipolis, 06103 Nice, France 
p Hopital Privé Le Blois Lille, 59003 Lille, France 
q Lille Hopital Roger-Salengro, 59000 Lille, France 
r Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and Interventional Cardiology, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Cardiologique de Haut Levêque, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, 33604 Pessac, France 
s Bordeaux Cardio-Thoracic Research Centre, CRTCB, Inserm U1045, Bordeaux University, 33600 Pessac, France 
t Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospice Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon-Brom, 69500 Lyon, France 
u Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, AP–HP, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 75015 Paris, France 
v Université Rennes 1, Department of Cardiology, CHU de Rennes, Inserm, LTSI, UMR 1099, 35000 Rennes, France 
w Université Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse 3, 31000 Toulouse, France 
x Recherche Enseignement en Insuffisance Cardiaque Avancée Transplantation et Assistance (REICATRA), Institut Saint-Jacques, 31300 Toulouse, France 

Corresponding author at: Institute of Cardiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP–HP, Sorbonne Université, 47–83, boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France. Institute of Cardiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP–HP, Sorbonne Université 47–83, boulevard de l’Hôpital Paris cedex 13 75651 France ⁎⁎ Co-corresponding author at: Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, TSA 50032, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France. Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital 1, avenue Jean-Poulhès, TSA 50032 Toulouse cedex 9 31059 France
En prensa. Pruebas corregidas por el autor. Disponible en línea desde el Saturday 06 December 2025

Graphical abstract




El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Among the patients with CS, 17.5% received temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS).
Among the tMCS, 69.0% were implanted on the day of admission.
tMCS use was associated with an ischaemic or mechanical trigger and increased lactate.
Thirty-day mortality was similar by tMCS use after adjustment for age and CS severity.
Among 30-day survivors, mortality was similar by tMCS use.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Background

Patients in cardiogenic shock (CS) can benefit from temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) but data in heterogeneous populations with diverse CS aetiologies are rare.

Aims

To compare baseline characteristics, management and independent correlates of 30-day and 1-year mortalities between patients managed with and without tMCS for CS.

Methods

The FRENSHOCK registry ( NCT02703038 ) included 772 unselected patients with CS admitted in 49 French critical care units between April and October 2016.

Results

Among 770 patients with CS and available data, 135 (17.5%) received tMCS (63 extracorporeal life support, 35 intra-aortic balloon pump, 13 micro-axial flow pump and 24 combination), of whom 69.0% were implanted during the first 24 hours. Patients with tMCS were less likely to present with histories of cardiac or peripheral artery diseases or chronic renal failure. An ischaemic or mechanical complication trigger for CS tripled the probability of receiving tMCS, while increased lactate doubled the probability. Thirty-day mortality was higher among patients with versus without tMCS (34.1% vs. 24.3%; P < 0.001), but after adjustment for age and CS severity (LVEF and arterial lactates at admission, noradrenaline and invasive mechanical ventilation use), the difference was no longer significant (hazard ratio: 1.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.93–2.01). Among 30-day survivors, mortality was similar regardless of initial receipt of tMCS ( P = 0.312).

Conclusion

In real-life practice, tMCS may not be associated with improvements in 30-day or 1-year mortality in an all-comers cohort of patients with CS. However, it should be noted that there were substantial differences in patient characteristics and management between patients who received tMCS and those who did not. Additional targeted studies should help to determine more precise algorithms for granting assistance within the complex and heterogeneous population of patients with CS.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Cardiogenic shock, Mechanical circulatory support, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Microaxial flow pump, Prognosis


Esquema


© 2025  The Author(s). Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.