Suscribirse

Spherical Equivalent Refraction Versus Axial Length for Monitoring Childhood Myopia and Estimating Disease Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - 05/05/26

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajo.2026.03.007 
Robert A. Clark a, b, , Rupa K. Wong c, d
a From South Bay Family Eye (R.A.C.), Long Beach, California, USA 
b Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (R.A.C.), Los Angeles, California, USA 
c John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii (R.K.W.), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 
d Honolulu Eye Clinic (R.K.W.), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 

Inquiries to Robert A. Clark, MD, South Bay Family Eye, Long Beach, California, USA South Bay Family Eye Long Beach California USA

Resumen

TOPIC

To determine the relative merits of spherical equivalent refraction (SER) vs axial length (AL) as the primary measure for monitoring childhood myopia progression and predicting adult myopia-related pathology.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Myopia prevalence is rising worldwide, but most patients only reach low-to-moderate myopia. Many guidelines emphasize AL over SER using fixed thresholds to define ``high risk'' (eg, ≥26 mm), yet a large proportion of myopia-related pathology occurs in eyes that never reach those lengths.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based observational studies (≥200 eyes; PubMed and Embase searched from 1990 to July 2025) reporting AL and/or SER with demographics and/or retinal, cataract, or primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) outcomes. Random effects meta-analyses with Hartung-Knapp adjustment were performed when k ≥ 3; other results were synthesized descriptively. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and certainty of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

RESULTS

Seventy studies met inclusion criteria. Normal AL varied strongly with age, sex, height, and ethnicity, whereas SER showed much weaker dependence. A small tail of emmetropes reached AL ≥26 mm. Retinal pathology rose steeply with longer AL (odds ratio [OR] 3.85 per +1 mm), implying risk ratio ≈25 at AL 26 mm relative to AL 23.6 mm (pooled gradient), but this long-eye threshold applied to <10% of eyes. SER data, although less frequent, showed consistent retinal risk increases with OR ≈1.5 to 1.8 per –1 diopter and OR 2 to 12 for high myopia. For cataract prevalence, SER-defined moderate/high myopia yielded ORs of 3.09 for nuclear and 4.58 for posterior subcapsular cataract, whereas AL-defined effects were null or modest. For POAG prevalence, AL per +1 mm showed OR 1.37, whereas SER-defined moderate/high myopia showed OR 2.95. Certainty of evidence was moderate for prevalence analyses and lower for incidence and descriptive blocks.

CONCLUSION

Absolute AL thresholds clearly identify a small tail of very long eyes at high retinal risk, but SER better captures cataract and POAG risk gradients across the myopic range that most patients will reach. SER should be the primary progression and risk metric for monitoring childhood myopia control, with AL used selectively to monitor the minority of children with greater axial elongation.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


  Supplemental Material available at AJO.com .
 Meeting Presentation: Poster presentation at the American Academy for Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus annual meeting in Boston, MA, March 2026, and paper presentation at the American Ophthalmological Society annual meeting in Santa Fe, New Mexico, May 2026.


© 2026  The Author(s). Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 286

P. 235-247 - juin 2026 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Relationship Between Home Environment Features and Difficulty in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Other Patient-Reported Measures in Persons With Glaucoma
  • Seema Banerjee, Aleksandra Mihailovic, Moon Jeong Lee, Rhonda Miller, Xindi Chen, Louay Almidani, Mariah Diaz, Laura N. Gitlin, Pradeep Y. Ramulu
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Correcting Astigmatism Using Toric Intraocular Lenses During Cataract Surgery
  • Jan-Willem H. Verstraaten, Matilde Buzzi, Mouayad Masalkhi, Anders Behndig, Béatrice Cochener, Alexander C. Day, H. Burkhard Dick, Oliver Findl, Ruth Lapid-Gortzak, Thomas Kohnen, Rudy Nuijts, Paul Rosen, Frank J.H.M. van den Biggelaar, Adi Abulafia, Gianni Virgili, Mor M. Dickman

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.