Interstitial lung disease pattern recognition on full high resolution computed tomography volume: Development and evaluation of a decision-support tool for less-experimented radiologists - 28/06/26

Highlights |
• | A deep learning model achieved 77.8% accuracy in recognizing usual interstitial pneumonia, non-specific interstitial pneumonia, and fibrotic bronchiolocentric interstitial pneumonia patterns on high resolution CT, similar to expert thoracic radiologists. |
• | Artificial intelligence assistance helps improve radiology resident diagnostic accuracy by 14.8 percentage points and reduced reading time by 20.7% ( P < 0.001). |
• | Despite improvements, 75% of residents underperform compared to artificial intelligence alone, underscoring variability in benefit from artificial intelligence support. |
Abstract |
Purpose |
The purpose of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to assist recognition of three major interstitial lung disease (ILD) patterns on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and to evaluate its added value in supporting decision-making for non-specialist radiologists.
Material and methods |
This retrospective, multicenter study included 1097 HRCT examinations. Of these, 989 (90.15%) were used for development and 108 (9.85%) for external testing. A two-stage architecture inspired by domain-specific pretraining was employed. The encoder of a three-dimensional ILD segmentation model was kept to extract 7168 disease-specific features per HRCT, which were combined with age and sex in a deep learning model to predict three radiological patterns (usual interstitial pneumonia, non-specific interstitial pneumonia and fibrotic bronchiolocentric interstitial pneumonia) as diagnosed in multidisciplinary discussions (MDD). The external test dataset was interpreted by seven thoracic radiologists to establish a second reference (majority’s vote) and by eight radiology residents with and without AI assistance. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each pattern.
Results |
The AI system achieved 77.8% accuracy on the external test dataset using MMD as a reference standard, within the range of thoracic experts (median, 75.6%; range: 61.1–81.5). AI assistance improved residents’ median accuracy (+14.8% of absolute increase) and reduced reading time by 20.7% ( P < 0.001). Six out of eight residents assisted by AI (75%) performed worse than AI alone.
Conclusion |
AI can accurately classify major ILD patterns and help less-experienced readers improve their performance. However, the level of improvement was inconsistent, and non-specialists rarely equaled the performance of AI alone.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Artificial Intelligence, High-resolution computed tomography, Interstitial lung disease, Multidetector computed tomography
Abbreviations : 3D, AI, ALAT, ATS, fBIP, CBIR, CI, ERS, HRCT, ILD, IPF, MDD, NSIP, NSIP-OP, Q1, Q3, UIP
Esquema
Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
