Suscribirse

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the efficacy of oral psoralen plus ultraviolet A for the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (improvement of 75% or greater) at 12 weeks - 07/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.053 
S. Priya Sivanesan, MD, MPH a, Shilpa Gattu, BS c, Judith Hong, MD b, Arianne Chavez-Frazier, MD d, Grace D. Bandow, MD e, Farah Malick, MD f, Greg Kricorian, MD g, John Koo, MD b,
a Department of Dermatology, Pittsburgh University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 
b Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, California 
c University of California, Irvine, California 
d Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 
e Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York 
f Department of Dermatology, Wayne State University, Dearborn, Michigan 
g Amgen Pharmaceuticals, Orange County, California 

Reprint requests: John Koo, MD, 515 Spruce St, San Francisco, CA 94118.

Abstract

Background

Psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) for the treatment of psoriasis has never been evaluated using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The lack of such data limits our capacity to estimate PUVA’s efficacy relative to other treatment options that are available today.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PUVA therapy for patients with plaque-type psoriasis.

Methods

This study involved 40 patients with psoriasis; 30 received PUVA and 10 received UVA with placebo. PASI scores were assessed at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter for 12 weeks.

Results

By nonresponder imputation, 60% (18 of 30) in the PUVA group achieved 75% or more improvement in PASI score after 12 weeks of treatment compared with 0% (0 of 10) in the UVA plus placebo group (P < .0001). Using intent to treat with last observation carried forward analysis, 63% (19 of 30) in the PUVA group achieved 75% or more improvement in PASI score compared with 0% (0 of 10) in the UVA plus placebo group (P < .0001). By per protocol analysis, 86% (18 of 21) in the PUVA group as compared with 0% (0 of 7) in the UVA plus placebo group reached 75% or more improvement in PASI score after 12 weeks (P < .0001).

Limitations

The study was relatively small with only 40 patients enrolled and 28 patients who completed the protocol. Further studies that involve head-to-head comparison of PUVA with other treatment modalities are needed. Nonresponder imputation, last observation carried forward with intent to treat, and per protocol analyses each have separate advantages and limitations when determining clinical significance.

Conclusions

This study supports the observation that PUVA is a highly efficacious treatment for chronic plaque psoriasis.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Key words : PASI 75, psoriasis, PUVA

Abbreviations used : CI, LOCF, NB, NRI, PASI, PASI 50, PASI 75, PP, PUVA, UV


Esquema


 Supported by Valeant Pharmaceuticals.
 Disclosure: Dr Koo has been a clinical researcher and/or consultant and/or speaker for Valeant, Allergan, Warner-Chilcott, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centacor, Connetics, Elan, Astellas, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKlein, Novartis, Roche, and Serono. Ms Gattu is a consultant for Coria Labs. Dr Kricorian was an employee at Amgen Pharmaceuticals. Drs Sivanesan, Hong, Chavez-Frazier, Bandow, and Malick have no conflicts of interest to declare.
 Interim data were presented orally at the American Academy of Dermatology 63rd Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, February 18-22, 2005.


© 2009  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 61 - N° 5

P. 793-798 - novembre 2009 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Exposure to mass media health information, skin cancer beliefs, and sun protection behaviors in a United States probability sample
  • Jennifer Hay, Elliot J. Coups, Jennifer Ford, Marco DiBonaventura
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • What’s New Online?

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.