From Randomized Controlled Trials to Observational Studies - 12/08/11

Abstract |
Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in the hierarchy of research designs for evaluating the efficacy and safety of a treatment intervention. However, their results can have limited applicability to patients in clinical settings. Observational studies using large health care databases can complement findings from randomized controlled trials by assessing treatment effectiveness in patients encountered in day-to-day clinical practice. Results from these designs can expand upon outcomes of randomized controlled trials because of the use of larger and more diverse patient populations with common comorbidities and longer follow-up periods. Furthermore, well-designed observational studies can identify clinically important differences among therapeutic options and provide data on long-term drug effectiveness and safety.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Health care databases, Observational studies, Osteoporosis, Randomized controlled trials, Treatment effectiveness
Esquema
| Funding: The author received editorial support in the preparation of this manuscript funded by The Alliance for Better Bone Health (Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and sanofi-aventis U.S., Inc). The author, however, was fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions and received no financial support or other form of compensation related to the development of the article. |
|
| Conflict of interest: The author is a consultant and speaker for The Alliance for Better Bone Health and has received research grant support. |
|
| Authorship: The author had access to the data and maintained complete control of manuscript development. |
Vol 122 - N° 2
P. 114-120 - février 2009 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
