Suscribirse

THE LATIN AMERICAN GUIDE FOR PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS : A Cultural Overview - 17/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0193-953X(05)70239-2 
Carlos E. Berganza, MD a, Juan Enrique Mezzich, MD, PhD b, Angel A. Otero-Ojeda, MD c, Miguel Roberto Jorge, MD, PhD d, Sergio J. Villaseñor-Bayardo, MD, PhD e, Carlos Rojas-Malpica, MD f
a Child Psychiatry Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, San Carlos University School of Medicine, Guatemala, Guatemala (CEB) 
b Division of Psychiatric Epidemiology and International Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York (JEM) 
c Department of Psychiatry, Havana University; the Executive Committee, Cuban Glossary of Psychiatry, Havana, Cuba (AAO) 
d Section of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (MRJ) 
e Department of Social Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico (SJV) 
f Department of Mental Health, University of Carabobo Faculty of Health Sciences, Valencia, Venezuela (CRM) 

Resumen

After making important advances in diagnostic reliability, the field of psychiatry seems to be turning its attention back to diagnostic validity. In psychiatric nosology two parallel efforts seem to be taking place: one, addressed at the development of a truly international system for classifying psychiatric disorders, and a second one, concerned with the incorporation of cultural variables in the formulation of the psychiatric diagnosis in order to make it more useful for treatment planning and health promotion. These efforts are not merely academic, they are necessary for clinical practice, as ethnic and cultural diversity of those seeking mental health services increase around the world, especially in developed societies, such as the United States.11

Among recent efforts to update diagnostic validity, existing universalistic diagnostic systems are being examined critically in order to pay closer attention to local realities and the uniqueness of the individual patient. The first type of these developments involves adaptations of the international classification system to regional or national clinical patterns and needs.21 A second one is the recognition of the practical importance of making contextual factors an important part of the diagnostic formulation, including the perspectives of the patient and his or her family, as recently proposed by the World Psychiatric Association.40

The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders37 is being accepted currently by most countries and by the World Psychiatric Association as the international standard in the field for statistical reporting and for clinical care and research. Emerging now is the need to harmonize international communication with recognition of cultural diversity and specific local requirements. Developers of the United States classification system in psychiatry have admitted that “specific and consistent attention to the role of culture in presentation and diagnosis is an innovation of DSM-IV.”10 They go on to recognize that this reflects their concern on the misapplication in different countries and ethnic populations of a diagnostic system that, like any other, is a product of the specific cultural and socioeconomic forces of the specific setting in which it has been developed. A consequence of this recognition of culture by North American nosologists is the inclusion, in the description of disorders in DSM-IV, of information on “the ways in which varied cultural backgrounds affect the content and form of the symptom presentation.”6 Another is the inclusion of a Cultural Formulation Outline in DSM-IV.19

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Address reprint requests to Carlos E. Berganza, MD, Avenida La Reforma 13–70 zona 9, Suite 11-B, Guatemala, Guatemala, e-mail: drcarlos@comcel.com.gt


© 2001  W. B. Saunders Company. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 24 - N° 3

P. 433-446 - septembre 2001 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • FROM DIVERSITY TO UNITY : The Classification of Mental Disorders in 21st-Century China
  • Sing Lee
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • CULTURE AND SCHIZOPHRENIA AND OTHER PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS
  • Parmanand Kulhara, Subho Chakrabarti

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.