Suscribirse

Differences in antibiotic prescribing among physicians, residents, and nonphysician clinicians - 21/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.02.013 
Christianne L. Roumie, MD, MPH a, b, , Natasha B. Halasa, MD, MPH c, Kathryn M. Edwards, MD c, Yuwei Zhu, MD, MS d, Robert S. Dittus, MD, MPH a, b, Marie R. Griffin, MD, MPH b, e
a Quality Scholars Program, Veterans Administration Tennessee Valley Healthcare System-Health Services Research and Development, Nashville, Tennessee 
b Department of Medicine (General Internal Medicine), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 
c Department of Pediatrics (Infectious Disease), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 
d Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 
e Departments of Preventive Medicine (Pharmacoepidemiology), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Christianne L. Roumie, MD, MPH, Nashville VA Medical Center, 1310 24th Ave. South, GRECC 4A120, Nashville, TN 37212

Abstract

Purpose

State legislatures have increased the prescribing capabilities of nurse practitioners and physician assistants and broadened the scope of their practice roles. To determine the impact of these changes, we compared outpatient antibiotic prescribing by practicing physicians, nonphysician clinicians, and resident physicians.

Methods

Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), we conducted a cross-sectional study of patients ≥18 years of age receiving care in 3 outpatient settings: office practices, hospital practices, and emergency departments, 1995–2000. We measured the proportion of all visits and visits for respiratory diagnoses where antibiotics are rarely indicated in which an antibiotic was prescribed by practitioner type.

Results

For all patient visits, nonphysician clinicians were more likely to prescribe antibiotics than practicing physicians for visits in office practices (26.3% vs 16.2%), emergency departments (23.8% vs 18.2%), and hospital clinics (25.2% vs 14.6%). Similarly, for the subset of visits for respiratory conditions where antibiotics are rarely indicated, nonphysician clinicians prescribed antibiotics more often than practicing physicians in office practices (odds ratio [OR] 1.86, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.05 to 3.29), and in hospital practices (OR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.15). In hospital practices, resident physicians had lower prescribing rates than practicing physicians for all visits as well as visits for respiratory conditions where antibiotics are rarely indicated (OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.86).

Conclusion

Nonphysician clinicians were more likely to prescribe antibiotics than practicing physicians in outpatient settings, and resident physicians were less likely to prescribe antibiotics. These differences suggest that general educational campaigns to reduce antibiotic prescribing have not reached all providers.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Antibiotics, Prescribing, Respiratory tract infections, NAMCS, NHAMCS


Esquema


 This work was supported in part by the Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA National Quality Scholars Program, the VA Tennessee Valley Clinical Research Center of Excellence, the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs, and the HSR& D Targeted Research Enhancement Program-Center for Patient Healthcare Behavior (TRP 03-073) Tennessee Valley Healthcare Systems, Nashville, Tennessee (CLR, RSD, MRG); Public Health Service award K12 RR017697 for the Vanderbilt Mentored Clinical Research Scholar Program (NBH); Vanderbilt Center for Education and Research Vanderbilt Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (MRG).


© 2005  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 118 - N° 6

P. 641-648 - juin 2005 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • The composition of normal pericardial fluid and its implications for diagnosing pericardial effusions
  • Shomron Ben-Horin, Ami Shinfeld, Erez Kachel, Angela Chetrit, Avi Livneh
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Short-term and long-term asthma control in patients with mild persistent asthma receiving montelukast or fluticasone: a randomized controlled trial
  • Robert S. Zeiger, Steven R. Bird, Michael S. Kaplan, Michael Schatz, David S. Pearlman, E. John Orav, Carolyn M. Hustad, Jonathan M. Edelman

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.