Suscribirse

Nephrotic range proteinuria and CD4 count as noninvasive indicators of HIV-associated nephropathy - 21/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.05.027 
Mohamed G. Atta, MD, MPH a, , Michael J. Choi, MD a, J. Craig Longenecker, MD, PhD e, Megan Haymart, MD d, Jean Wu, MD, MHS a, Nagapradeep Nagajothi, MD c, Lorraine C. Racusen, MD b, Paul J. Scheel, MD, MBA a, Frederick L. Brancati, MD, MHS d, Derek M. Fine, MD a
a Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 
b Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md 
c Department of Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Sciences, Chicago, Ill 
d Department of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait 
e Department of Community Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait. 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Mohamed G. Atta, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University, Division of Nephrology, 1830 East Monument Street, Suite 416, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Abstract

Purpose

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated nephropathy is a common and serious cause of progressive renal insufficiency in patients with HIV, frequently presenting with nephrotic range proteinuria. The purpose of this study is to document the histopathologic diagnoses seen in HIV-positive patients with and without nephrotic range proteinuria and to evaluate the predictive value of both nephrotic range proteinuria and CD4 count in diagnosing HIV-associated nephropathy.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional, single-center study of all 107 HIV-positive patients who had both a renal biopsy and urine protein measurement between 1995 and 2002. Nephrotic range proteinuria was defined as a urine protein-to-creatinine ratio > 3 or a 24-hour urine protein > 3 g. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of those patients with and without HIV-associated nephropathy were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of nephrotic range proteinuria in the diagnosis of HIV-associated nephropathy were determined.

Results

Fifty-five biopsied patients had nephrotic range proteinuria, among whom 29 (53%) were diagnosed with HIV-associated nephropathy. Among the remaining patients, 12 had non-HIV-associated nephropathy focal segmental glomeruloscerlosis, 3 had membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, 2 had AA Amyloid, 2 had diabetic nephropathy, and 7 had other diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of nephrotic proteinuria in the diagnosis of HIV-associated nephropathy were 73%, 61%, 53%, and 79%, respectively. The patients with HIV-associated nephropathy had a significantly higher creatinine (8.2 mg/dL vs 2.5 mg/dL, P < .001) and a lower CD4 count (158 count/mm3 vs 349 count/mm3, P < .01) at the time of biopsy. Although significantly more patients with HIV-associated nephropathy had a CD4 count below 200 (P = .03), among those with a CD4 count below 200, 10 of 30 patients (33%) had diagnoses other than HIV-associated nephropathy. Injection drug use, presence of hepatitis C, and hypertension were not associated with HIV-associated nephropathy.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that HIV patients with nephrotic range proteinuria warrant a kidney biopsy because the presence of nephrotic range proteinuria, even in the presence a low CD4 count, does not establish the diagnosis of HIV-associated nephropathy.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : HIV-associated nephropathy, Proteinuria, Nephrotic syndrome, Renal biopsy, HIV


Esquema


© 2005  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 118 - N° 11

P. 1288.e21-1288.e26 - novembre 2005 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Proinflammatory state and circulating erythropoietin in persons with and without anemia
  • Luigi Ferrucci, Jack M. Guralnik, Richard C. Woodman, Stefania Bandinelli, Fulvio Lauretani, Anna Maria Corsi, Paulo H.M. Chaves, William B. Ershler, Dan L. Longo
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • A randomized trial comparing electronic and conventional stethoscopes
  • Kasper Iversen, Rasmus Greibe, Hans Bording Timm, Lene Theil Skovgaard, Morten Dalsgaard, Kirsten Vang Hendriksen, Asbjorn Hrobjartsson

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.