Comparison between a sustained administration of carvedilol versus atenolol to reduce restenosis after coronary stenting - 26/08/11
, Moo Hyun Kim, MD, PhD, FACC a, Jin Woo Kim, MD b, Doo Il Kim, MD b, Hje Jin Kim, RN a, Dong Soo Kim, MD c, Jong Seong Kim, MD, PhD, FACC aAbstract |
Background |
Carvedilol is a direct inhibitor of vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation through inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity and regulation of cell cycle progression. It produced an 84% suppression of neointimal hyperplasia in rat carotid angioplasty model, but no data are available regarding its effect on stent restenosis in patients. We tested whether a sustained oral administration of carvedilol reduces restenosis after coronary stenting in patients.
Methods |
One hundred fifty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive either carvedilol (50 mg/d, n = 80) or atenolol (50 mg/d, n = 79) at least 1 day before stenting and continued on the same medication over a period of 3 months. The primary end point was angiographic restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis) at follow-up angiography.
Results |
Baseline clinical and angiographic variables were similar between the carvedilol and atenolol group. The carvedilol dose was tolerable in most patients but reduced in 3 patients because of hypotension or dizziness. Angiographic follow-up was done in 137 patients (86%), and restenosis rate was not different significantly between both groups (17.1% versus 19.4%, P = .732).
Conclusions |
A sustained oral administration of carvedilol is not effective to reduce restenosis after stenting in patients. With carvedilol targeting regulators of cell cycle progression and having a profound neointimal inhibition with a high blood concentration in an animal study, further investigations with a stent-based delivery to achieve a high local concentration may be warranted.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Esquema
| Supported by a grant (No. 2000-9) from the Korean Circulation Society. |
Vol 147 - N° 2
P. 323 - février 2004 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
