Suscribirse

RADICAL RETROPUBLIC PROSTATECTOMY - 03/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70159-2 
Herbert Lepor, MD *

Resumen

Radical retropubic prostatectomy originally was described by Millin in 1945.6 Many urologists embraced the retropubic approach because they were more familiar with retropubic anatomy. An advantage of the retropubic versus the perineal approach was the ability to perform a simultaneous staging pelvic lymphadenectomy.13 Historically, significant bleeding often was encountered while attempting to control the dorsal venous complex during radical retropubic prostatectomy. One of the advantages of the perineal approach was less intraoperative bleeding because it was not necessary to ligate the dorsal venous complex.13

Development of the anatomic nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy by Walsh required a bloodless operative field and a thorough knowledge of pelvic anatomy. Reiner and Walsh8 described the anatomy of the dorsal venous complex and a surgical technique for ligating this complex in 1977, which greatly diminished the bleeding associated with radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anatomic studies in the early 1980s demonstrated the precise relationship of the cavernous nerves relative to the prostate and other pelvic structures in the human fetus11 and adult.5

These landmark anatomic studies set the stage for Walsh's description of the anatomic nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.11 One of the major advantages of the anatomic nerve-sparing retropubic approach is the ability to preserve the cavernous nerves and erectile function in the overwhelming majority of men undergoing prostatectomy for the cure of clinically localized prostate cancer. An equally important advantage is the description of an anatomic surgical technique that greatly diminishes technical complications.

Owing to the widespread acceptance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in the early 1990s,1, 2 there has been a significant increase in the detection of clinically localized prostate cancer. Currently, radical prostatectomy represents one of the most common surgical procedures performed by urologists in community practice. The increasing experience of individual surgeons coupled with the anatomic nerve-sparing technique has diminished intraoperative technical complications greatly while improving outcomes related to quality of life.3, 14, 15

A new standard now exists for radical retropubic prostatectomy regarding intraoperative and postoperative complications.10 In the hands of experts, the surgical procedure is performed in less than 2 hours; the hospital stay is approximately 2 days; the operative mortality rate is typically less than 0.2%; technical complications, including rectal injury, urethral injury, and significant vascular injury, are less than 1%; transfusion rates are less than 10%; significant incontinence is exceedingly rare; and most potent men retain their erectile function.

Since 1986, the author has performed more than 1600 radical retropubic prostatectomies. The author is fortunate to have been the student of Patrick C. Walsh, MD, the developer and master of this operation. The author has not only participated in the evolution of the surgical technique but has witnessed Walsh's passion and commitment to improving the operative procedure. Although the framework of prostatectomy as performed by the author and Walsh is similar, the author's unique technical maneuvers are illustrated in this article. The author is grateful to medical illustrator Tori Guy, who worked diligently to transcribe events in the operating room into the illustrations presented in this manuscript.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Address reprint requests to Herbert Lepor, MD, Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, e-mail: herbert.lepor@med.nyu.edu


© 2001  W. B. Saunders Company. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 28 - N° 3

P. 509-519 - août 2001 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY : Preoperative Management
  • Nirit Rosenblum, Herbert Lepor
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • THE TECHNIQUE OF RADICAL PERINEAL PROSTATECTOMY
  • Michael J. Scolieri, Martin I. Resnick

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.