Suscribirse

SANDWICH THERAPY - 11/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70364-5 
Stevan B. Streem, MD *

Resumen

Although there have been no controlled, prospective studies comparing medical management with operative intervention, the role for early extirpation of staghorn calculi appears well established. During the last 25 years, many investigators have shown that an aggressive operative approach to affected patients is clearly advantageous. In those studies, the renal-related or sepsis-related mortality rates for patients treated primarily with medical management have been as high as 30%, compared with rates of only 5% for those managed with early operative intervention.2, 17 Even more recently, in the era of contemporary antibiotic therapy and routine availability of dialytic support, medical management has been associated with recurrence of symptomatic infection in 45% of patients, and continued loss of renal function and even renal-related mortality in up to 67% of patients.11, 31, 32

It seems clear that with rare exception the indications for intervention in a patient with a staghorn calculus, at least that presumed to be infection-related or composed of struvite, is simply the presence of that stone.21 Although the indications to intervene are clear, there is no definite consensus regarding the most appropriate form that the intervention should take. There is general agreement, however, that the intervention must be individualized, with specific consideration given to the size and configuration of the stone and the level of renal function overall and in the involved kidney. Additionally, the patient's body habitus and overall health or associated medical problems, especially as they relate to a risk of anesthesia, need to be factored into the development of an appropriate management plan.

With all the therapeutic modalities now available for managing affected patients, choosing the optimal technique requires consideration of many factors. These include the morbidity of the procedure, the length of hospitalization and disability, and the cost. Although these factors are important, primary consideration must be given to minimizing the rates of residual and recurrent stones and infection and to preserving renal function.

Landmark studies of carefully designed open operative procedures, such as anatrophic nephrolithotomy and extended pyelolithotomy, have documented the excellent immediate results that can be attained in regard to rates of morbidity and residual stones.8, 24 More important, however, is the documented long-term efficacy of these procedures. In reviewing the long-term follow-up of 100 patients undergoing anatrophic nephrolithotomy, Boyce and Elkins3 reported an incidence of recurrent stone and infection of only 17% for either alone or 9% for both together. The same study showed overall renal function to remain stable or improve in 98% of patients. Perhaps more significant was a later report from the same center regarding 30 patients with a solitary kidney who had undergone anatrophic nephrolithotomy.30 After an average follow-up of 6 years, the group as a whole showed no significant difference in renal function preoperatively and postoperatively, although some patients did suffer deterioration.

Even more recently, several investigators have shown that with long-term follow-up, open operative intervention for staghorn calculi is associated with recurrent stone and infection in less than 30% of patients, respectively. These studies also suggest that better results are obtained if the renal unit initially is rendered stone-free.9, 12, 22 Although new, less invasive techniques are now available to manage patients with large or otherwise complex calculi, the immediate and long-term results should be compared with those now well-documented during the last quarter century for open operative intervention.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Address reprint requests to Stevan B. Streem, MD, Department of Urology, Desk A100, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195


© 1997  W. B. Saunders Company. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 24 - N° 1

P. 213-223 - février 1997 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY : Development, Instrumentation, and Current Status
  • James E. Lingeman
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • ORTHOTOPIC BLADDER SUBSTITUTION IN WOMEN FOLLOWING CYSTECTOMY FOR BLADDER CANCER
  • Mohamed A. Ghoneim

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.