Interventions to Increase Osteoporosis Treatment in Patients with ‘Incidentally’ Detected Vertebral Fractures - 30/08/12
, Finlay A. McAlister, MD, MSc a, b, Jeffrey A. Johnson, PhD b, Debbie Bellerose, BScN a, Kerry Siminoski, MD a, David A. Hanley, MD c, Ibrahim Qazi, PhD a, Douglas A. Lier, MA a, Robert G. Lambert, MD d, Anthony S. Russell, MD a, Brian H. Rowe, MD, MSc eAbstract |
Background |
Most vertebral compression fractures are not recognized or treated. We conducted a controlled trial in older patients with vertebral fractures incidentally reported on chest radiographs, comparing usual care with osteoporosis interventions directed at physicians (opinion-leader-endorsed evidence summaries and reminders) or physicians+patients (adding activation with leaflets and telephone counseling).
Methods |
Patients aged >60 years who were discharged home from emergency departments and who had vertebral fractures reported but were not treated for osteoporosis were allocated to usual care (control) or physician intervention using alternate-week time series. After 3 months, untreated controls were re-allocated to physician+patient intervention. Allocation was concealed, outcomes ascertainment blinded, and analyses intent-to-treat. Primary outcome was starting osteoporosis treatment within 3 months.
Results |
There were 1315 consecutive patients screened, and 240 allocated to control (n=123) or physician intervention (n=117). Groups were similar at baseline (average age 74 years, 45% female, 58% previous fractures). Compared with controls, physician interventions significantly (all P <.001) increased osteoporosis treatment (20 [17%] vs 2 [2%]), bone mineral density testing (51 [44%] vs 5 [4%]), and bone mineral density testing or treatment (57 [49%] vs 7 [6%]). Three months after controls were re-allocated to physician+patient interventions, 22% had started treatment and 65% had bone mineral density testing or treatment (P <.001 vs controls). Physician+patient interventions increased bone mineral density testing or treatment an additional 16% compared with physician interventions (P=.01).
Conclusions |
An opinion-leader-based intervention targeting physicians substantially improved rates of bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment in patients with incidental vertebral fractures, compared with usual care. Even better osteoporosis management was achieved by adding patient activation to physician interventions [NCT00388908].
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keywords : Guidelines, Osteoporosis, Quality improvement, Treatment, Trials
Esquema
| Funding: Peer-reviewed operating grants from Knowledge Translation Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP #151454), and the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR). S.R.M., F.A.M., J.A.J. hold salary awards from AHFMR, and J.A.J. and B.H.R. hold Canada Research Chairs. |
|
| Conflict of Interest: None. |
|
| Authorship: The corresponding author (SRM) had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors were involved in conception and design and analysis and interpretation and provided critical revision to manuscript drafts. IQ also undertook statistical analyses. SRM also wrote the first draft, obtained funding, and supervised the study. |
Vol 125 - N° 9
P. 929-936 - septembre 2012 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
