Suscribirse

External laryngeal manipulation does not improve the intubation success rate by novice intubators in a manikin study - 15/11/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.01.010 
Nir Samuel, MD a, Karyn Winkler b, Shuny Peled, MD a, Baruch Krauss, MD c, Itai Shavit, MD a,
a Department of Pediatric Emergency, Rambam Health Care Campus, Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, 31096, Israel 
b Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, 31096, Israel 
c Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 

Corresponding author. 369 P.O. B Nahariya, Israel, 22103. Tel.: +972 50 2063239.

Abstract

Background

External laryngeal manipulation (ELM) is a technique used in cases of poor glottic view in direct laryngoscopy. Studies investigating ELM in the pediatric population are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine if use of ELM by inexperienced intubators improves the success rate of pediatric intubation.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, controlled, manikin study comparing intubation using ELM (study subjects) with standard intubation (controls). Study participants were paramedic students. Each participant performed 1 intubation attempt on 3 different pediatric airway manikins, independently. If an optimal Cormack-Lehane glottic view (CLGV) of more than 2 has been obtained, study subjects were previously instructed to perform the intubation using ELM; controls were instructed to continue with standard intubation. Outcome measures were single-attempt intubation success rate, preintubation CLGV, and duration of intubation.

Results

The study group included 13 subjects who performed 39 intubations. In 19 intubations, CLGV of more than 2 had been obtained; and ELM was used. The control group included 14 subjects who performed 42 intubations. In 20 intubations, CLGV of more than 2 was obtained. Median CLGV score improved from 3.5 before ELM to 2 when ELM was used. However, no difference was found between the groups in intubation success rate (10/19 vs 14/20, P = .43); and the duration of intubation was significantly shorter in controls (25.8 vs 37.8 seconds, P < .007).

Conclusions

In this pediatric manikin study, ELM performed by novice intubators improved laryngeal view, but lengthened the duration of intubation and did not improve intubation success rate.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Esquema


 Author contributions information: N.S. conceived the idea for the study, designed the study, collected the data, and drafted the manuscript. K.W. assisted in creating the study design and in data collection. S.P. assisted in data collection. B.K. critically reviewed the manuscript. I.S. designed the study, drafted the manuscript, performed the statistical analysis, and reviewed the literature. I.S. has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


© 2012  Elsevier Inc. Reservados todos los derechos.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 30 - N° 9

P. 2005-2010 - novembre 2012 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Lack of efficacy of phenytoin in children presenting with febrile status epilepticus
  • Salima Ismail, Arielle Lévy, Helena Tikkanen, Marcel Sévère, Franciscus Johannes Wolters, Lionel Carmant
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • To-Go medications for decreasing ED return visits
  • Bryan D. Hayes, Leila Zaharna, Michael E. Winters, Agnes Ann Feemster, Brian J. Browne, Jon Mark Hirshon

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.