Effects of Different Complementary Feeding Regimens on Iron Status and Enteric Microbiota in Breastfed Infants - 23/07/13
Abstract |
Objective |
To compare iron status in breastfed infants randomized to groups receiving complementary feeding regimens that provided iron from fortified infant cereals or meats, and to examine the development of the enteric microbiota in these groups.
Study design |
Forty-five exclusively breastfed 5-month-old infants were randomized to 1 of 3 feeding groups (FGs)—commercially available pureed meats, iron- and zinc-fortified infant cereals, or iron-only fortified infant cereals—as the first and primary complementary food through 9-10 months of age. Dietary iron was determined by monthly 3-day diet records. Iron status was assessed at the end of the study by measurements of hemoglobin, serum ferritin, and soluble transferrin receptor levels. In a subsample of 14 infants, enteric microbiota were profiled in monthly stool samples (5-9 months) by 16S ribosomal RNA gene pyrosequencing.
Results |
Infants in the 2 cereal FGs had 2- to 3-fold greater daily iron intakes versus the meat FG (P < .0001). More than one-quarter (27%) of the infants had a low serum ferritin level, and 36% were mildly anemic, with no significant differences by FG; more infants in the meat FG had a high soluble transferrin receptor value (P = .03). Sequence analysis identified differences by time and FG in the abundances of several bacterial groups, including significantly more abundant butyrate-producing Clostridium group XIVa in the meat FG (P = .01)
Conclusion |
A high percentage of healthy infants who were breastfed-only were iron-deficient, and complementary feeding, including iron exposure, influenced the development of the enteric microbiota. If these findings are confirmed, then reconsideration of strategies to both meet infants' iron requirements and optimize the developing microbiome may be warranted.
El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.Keyword : FG, rRNA, sTfR, TDI
Esquema
| Supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; T32DK007658-20S, K24DK083772, and HG005964), NIH/National Center for Research Resources (UL1TR000154 to Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute), and National Cattlemen's Beef Association (Beef Checkoff). The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
Vol 163 - N° 2
P. 416 - août 2013 Regresar al númeroBienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.
¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?
