Suscribirse

Multidisciplinary Care Program for Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Reduces Renal Replacement and Medical Costs - 30/12/14

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.042 
Ping Min Chen, MD a, Tai Shuan Lai, MD b, Ping Yu Chen, MD c, Chun Fu Lai, MD a, Shao Yu Yang, MD a, VinCent Wu, MD, PhD a, Chih Kang Chiang, MD, PhD a, Tze Wah Kao, MD, PhD a, Jenq Wen Huang, MD, PhD a, Wen Chih Chiang, MD, PhD a, , Shuei Liong Lin, MD, PhD a, Kuan Yu Hung, MD, PhD a, Yung Ming Chen, MD a, Tzong Shinn Chu, MD, PhD a, Ming Shiou Wu, MD, PhD a, Kwan Dun Wu, MD, PhD a, Tun Jun Tsai, MD, PhD a
a Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 
b Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan 
c Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chia Li Campus, Tainan, Taiwan 

Requests for reprints should be addressed to Wen Chih Chiang, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 100, Taiwan.

Abstract

Background

Multidisciplinary care is advocated as an effective chronic kidney disease treatment program in a few, but not all, studies. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of multidisciplinary care on renal outcome and patient survival using a larger cohort.

Method

A total 1382 chronic kidney disease patients, ages 18-80 years, with chronic kidney disease stage 3B-5, in nephrology outpatient clinics were enrolled. Using age, sex, chronic kidney disease stage, and diabetes mellitus as variables, 592 multidisciplinary care program participants were matched with 614 nonmultidisciplinary care patients. The primary outcomes were long-term renal replacement therapy and mortality. Secondary outcomes included changes of biochemical markers and blood pressure, infection hospitalization, cardiovascular events, and emergent start of long-term dialysis. Annual medical costs were compared.

Results

There were no between-group differences regarding mortality. In the multivariate competing-risk regression model, the multidisciplinary care group had a better renal survival (hazard ratio 0.640; 95% confidence interval, 0.484-0.847; P = .002). This effect was most prominent in stage 4 (hazard ratio 0.375; 95% confidence interval, 0.219-0.640; P < .001), but not in stage 3B and 5 patients. The multidisciplinary care group showed a slower estimated glomerular filtration rate decline (−2.57 vs −3.74 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = .021), and a smaller increase in phosphate (+ 0.03 vs + 0.33 mg/dL, P = .013). Cardiovascular and infection events were both decreased in the multidisciplinary care group (P < .001). There was also less requirement of emergent start dialysis (39.6% vs 54.5%, P = .001). The annual cost for the multidisciplinary care group was lower than the nonmultidisciplinary care group (US $2372 vs $3794, P < .001). In addition, considering the reduction of patients requiring renal replacement therapy, the multidisciplinary care program saved a total US $1931 per patient annually.

Conclusions

Our analysis demonstrated that the multidisciplinary care program provided better health care and reduced renal replacement therapy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. By decreasing hospitalizations, emergent start, and the need for renal replacement therapy, the multidisciplinary care program was cost-effective.

El texto completo de este artículo está disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Chronic kidney disease, Multidisciplinary care, Renal outcome


Esquema


 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (3.0/).
 Funding: This study was supported by grants from Mrs. Hsiu-Chin Lee Kidney Research Foundation.
 Conflicts of Interest: None.
 Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.


© 2015  The Authors. Publicado por Elsevier Masson SAS. Todos los derechos reservados.
Añadir a mi biblioteca Eliminar de mi biblioteca Imprimir
Exportación

    Exportación citas

  • Fichero

  • Contenido

Vol 128 - N° 1

P. 68-76 - janvier 2015 Regresar al número
Artículo precedente Artículo precedente
  • Hypokalemia in Acute Medical Patients: Risk Factors and Prognosis
  • Helene Kildegaard Jensen, Mikkel Brabrand, Pernille Just Vinholt, Jesper Hallas, Annmarie Touborg Lassen
| Artículo siguiente Artículo siguiente
  • Measurement of Post-void Residual Bladder Volumes in Hospitalized Older Adults
  • Zvi Shimoni, Ela Fruger, Paul Froom

Bienvenido a EM-consulte, la referencia de los profesionales de la salud.
El acceso al texto completo de este artículo requiere una suscripción.

¿Ya suscrito a @@106933@@ revista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Mi cuenta


Declaración CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM se declara a la CNIL, la declaración N º 1286925.

En virtud de la Ley N º 78-17 del 6 de enero de 1978, relativa a las computadoras, archivos y libertades, usted tiene el derecho de oposición (art.26 de la ley), el acceso (art.34 a 38 Ley), y correcta (artículo 36 de la ley) los datos que le conciernen. Por lo tanto, usted puede pedir que se corrija, complementado, clarificado, actualizado o suprimido información sobre usted que son inexactos, incompletos, engañosos, obsoletos o cuya recogida o de conservación o uso está prohibido.
La información personal sobre los visitantes de nuestro sitio, incluyendo su identidad, son confidenciales.
El jefe del sitio en el honor se compromete a respetar la confidencialidad de los requisitos legales aplicables en Francia y no de revelar dicha información a terceros.


Todo el contenido en este sitio: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, sus licenciantes y colaboradores. Se reservan todos los derechos, incluidos los de minería de texto y datos, entrenamiento de IA y tecnologías similares. Para todo el contenido de acceso abierto, se aplican los términos de licencia de Creative Commons.