Abbonarsi

Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: Is C T scan the most accurate option? - 07/06/10

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.006 
G. Pasquier a, b, c, , G. Ducharne a, E. Sari Ali d, F. Giraud a, A. Mouttet e, E. Durante f
a Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Victor Provo Hospital Center, 59100 Roubaix, France 
b Université Lille Nord de France, 59000 Lille, France 
c C and D Orthopaedic Department, Roger Salengro Hospital, CHRU de Lille, Area Teaching Hospital Center, place de Verdun, 59037 Lille, France 
d Orthopaedic Department, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 7-83, boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France 
e Multispecialty Private Hospital, avenue Ambroise-Croizat, 66330 Cabestany, France 
f Computer Engineering Department, avenue des Sciences, 1400 Yverdons-les-Bains, Suisse 

Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 3 20 44 68 28; fax: +33 3 20 44 66 07.

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
Articolo gratuito.

Si connetta per beneficiarne

Summary

Background

Femoral offset is difficult to precisely evaluate with conventional X-ray techniques. Femoral offset characterizes the balance between body weight and the resistance provided by the abductor muscles. Total hip arthroplasties should respect this balance.

Hypothesis

Computed tomodensitometry (CT-scan) is more accurate than conventional X-ray to evaluate femoral offset.

Materials and methods

Sixty-one patients who received unilateral total hip arthroplasties were prospectively included in the study. Femoral offset was measured by three-dimensional CT-scan reconstruction using the “Hip Plan” (Symbios™) software. Offset was also determined with conventional X-ray and results were compared. This software can be used to measure leg length by frontal telemetry. It was developed for preoperative-planning of cementless femoral stem implants with modular necks of various lengths and angles. All pre- and postoperative measurements were made according to the same protocol.

Results

Femoral offset values in this study were very similar to anatomical values found in the literature. They were significantly higher than values obtained by conventional X-ray by an average of 8%. Implantation of hip replacements resulted in a significant increase in offset (1.88±4.71mm) with a slight variation in leg length. Pre- and postoperative leg length increased slightly in the operated leg by an average of 1.66±5.63mm. Seventeen percent of these femurs had high offset associated with small or average sized proximal medullary canals. This preoperative planning software made it possible to identify these difficulties and to adapt implant components using modular long 8° varus necks to restore high offset. In most of these cases, only small femoral stems could be implanted because of the small size of the intramedullary femoral canal. These individual differences were identified with 3D CT-scan reconstruction and included in the preoperative planning. Moreover, leg length could also be evaluated with this method and included in the preplanning.

Discussion

Compared to conventional X-ray, measurements obtained with this preoperative planning method using 3D CT-scan reconstruction are easy to obtain and not dependent upon test conditions because the frame is placed on the femoral axis. Measurements are not influenced by position inconsistencies or if the hip is fixed in external rotation. The significant number of cases with above average offset confirms the importance of obtaining these measurements and the necessity of adapting the strategy in these cases by using lateralized stems, or, as in our series, modular necks to adjust femoral offset and neck angle.

Level of evidence

Level III diagnostic prospective study.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : Femoral offset, Total hip arthroplasty, Preoperative planning, Leg length discrepancy, Computer assisted surgery


Mappa


© 2010  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 96 - N° 4

P. 367-375 - Giugno 2010 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Low back pain sufferers: Is standing postural balance facilitated by a lordotic lumbar brace?
  • F. Munoz, J.-F. Salmochi, P. Faouën, P. Rougier
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Does hyperflex total knee design improve postoperative active flexion?
  • P. Massin, F.-R. Dupuy, H. Khlifi, C. Fornasieri, T. De Polignac, P. Schifrine, C. Farenq, P. Mertl

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.