Incidence of vertebral pedicle fracture occurrence in thoracic and lumbar spine trauma. A CT-scan anatomical assessment - 20/05/26
, Michel Dagher a, b
, Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette a, b
, Charlie Bouthors c
, Byoung-Chol Yoon a, b
, Arnaud Dubory a, b 
Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder
Highlights |
• | Vertebral pedicle (VP) is an essential anatomical structure bringing the vertebral body to the posterior vertebral elements. |
• | Pedicle screws posterior instrumentation is the most widespread spinal fixation methods but inevitably needing VP integrity. |
• | At the best to our knowledge, no thoracolumbar spinal injury classification has directly considered the occurrence of VP injury expected the AO spine thoracolumbar injury classification in B1 sub-type named transosseous bad disruption Chance fracture comporting an axial VP fracture. A precise VP fracture is absent in all published classifications. |
• | VP fracture occurrence in thoracolumbar injury is not anecdotic regarding its founded incidence (25,4%). The increasing incidence of VP fractures is significantly related to the severity of the spine injury like severe neurological spinal injury (ASIA B; p < 0.05), Magerl B2 fractures (p < 0.001), Magerl C1-C2 fractures (p < 0.05) and an important fracture comminution (p < 0.05). |
• | VP fractures can be dichotomized into distinct scenarios: bilateral axial VP fractures occurring in a younger population having suffered from a flexion-distraction injury and unilateral frontal VP fractures in an older population in a context of compressive and comminuted spinal fracture. |
Abstract |
Study design |
Retrospective cohort study
Objective |
To determine the incidence and risk factors of VP fractures in thoracic and lumbar spine injuries.
Methods |
287 patients were included, and clinical data were collected. From the CT-scans, the presence of VP fracture, Magerl classification, fracture comminution, anatomy of the VP, level of spinal injury, type of VP fracture were assessed. The incidence of VP fractures and their associated risk factors were determined via a Spearman correlation study.
Results |
Seventy-three patients (25.4%) with a mean age of 50-years-old (95% CI [30.0 – 70.1]) presented a VP fracture and most (51 patients (69.9%)) had no neurological deficit. VP fractures were unilateral in 57 patients (78.1%) and bilateral in 16 patients (21.9%). Axial VP fractures were linked to Magerl B2 fractures (p < 0.05) while coronal VP fractures were associated with an extensive vertebral fracture comminution (p < 0.05). The incidence of VP fractures increased with severe neurological spinal injury (ASIA B; p < 0.05), Magerl B2 fractures (p < 0.001), Magerl C1-C2 fractures (p < 0.05) and an important fracture comminution (p < 0.05). Communited Magerl A3 fractures were associated with unipedicular fracture, whereas Magerl B2 fractures were linked to bipedicular fractures (p < 0.05). With regard to the type of VP fracture, axial pedicle fractures are found more often in cases of bilateral pedicular fractures (p < 0001). Morphometric data, anatomical characteristics of the VP and the type of trauma did not influence the VP fracture occurrence.
Conclusion |
Incidence of VP fractures is non-negligible and should be more considered in future classifications of thoracic and lumbar spines injuries.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : vertebral pedicle, anatomy, spine trauma, CT-scan, vertebral fracture
Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
