Letter to the Editor – Commentary on "Aggressive surgery for metastatic spinal tumors" (Neurochirurgie 2026;72:101803) - 20/05/26
Highlights |
• | Surgical decision-making for metastatic spinal tumors (MST) must extend beyond survival scoring to incorporate functional status, tumor biology, and spinal instability. |
• | A structured risk-stratification framework integrating SINS, Karnofsky Performance Status, and tumor histology is needed to guide patient selection for aggressive resection. |
• | The indications for en bloc resection versus hybrid therapy (separation surgery + sSRS) require clearer delineation, particularly in the era of modern immunotherapy and targeted agents. |
• | Standardized preoperative embolization protocols are critical given that technique-dependent variability directly impacts intraoperative blood loss and patient safety. |
• | Centralization of complex oncologic spine surgery to high-volume centers and prospective registries with standardized outcomes reporting are essential to advance the evidence base. |
Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

