Observer variation in the echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse - 12/10/17
Abstract |
To assess inter- and intraobserver variation in the echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse, three independent observers analyzed M-mode echocardiograms (n = 80) and two-dimensional echocardiograms (n = 65) of patients with a mobile midsystolic click with or without a late or holosystolic murmur. In addition, a control group of 100 normal echocardiograms were interspersed among the echocardiograms of patients with mitral valve prolapse and were then interpreted. Each of the three observers analyzed all M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiograms initially and then 2 weeks later for the presence or absence of mitral valve prolapse. M-mode echocardiographic criteria for mitral valve prolapse consisted of late systolic posterior motion (≥ 3 mm) of one or both mitral leaflets or holosystolic hammocking (≥ 3 mm) of one or both mitral leaflets. Two-dimensional echocardiographic criteria for mitral valve prolapse consisted of: posterior systolic arching of one or both mitral leaflets in the parasternal long-axis view, and/or posterior systolic bowing of one or both mitral leaflets in the apical four-chamber view posterior to the plane of the mitral anulus, and/or excessive posterior coaptation of the mitral leaflets in either view flush with or posterior to the plane of the mitral anulus. There was insignificant observer variation both in the M-mode and two-dimensional echo groups, as determined using Cochran's Q test. The proportion of cases in the group with clinical mitral valve prolapse for which there was unanimous agreement was 81% and 78%, respectively, for the first and second readings for M-mode echocardiography, and 69% and 72% for the first and second readings, respectively, for two-dimensional echocardiography. Intraobserver repeatability for the first and second readings ranged from 89% to 96% for M-mode echocardiography and 77% to 86% for two-dimensional echocardiography. The data indicate that both echocardiographic modalities are associated with insignificant inter- and intraobserver variation in the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Vol 111 - N° 6
P. 1123-1129 - juin 1986 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
