S'abonner

Associations of Intraoperative Flow Disruptions and Operating Room Teamwork During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy - 11/04/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.060 
Matthias Weigl a, * , Jeannette Weber a, b, Elyse Hallett c, Michael Pfandler a, Boris Schlenker d, Armin Becker d, Ken Catchpole e
a Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany 
b Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany 
c Department of Psychology, California State University, Long Beach, CA 
d Department of Urology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University-Munich, Munich, Germany 
e Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 

*Address correspondence to: Dr. Matthias Weigl, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Ziemssenstrasse 1, 80336 Munich, Germany.Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental MedicineLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichZiemssenstrasse 1Munich80336Germany

Abstract

Objective

To identify type and severity of surgical flow disruptions and to determine their impact on the perception of intraoperative teamwork.

Methods

Forty radical prostatectomy cases were studied in an academic department for urology. A standardized observational tool for identification of type and severity of flow disruptions was applied during real-time prostatectomy procedures. Additionally, all operating room team members evaluated intraoperative teamwork immediately after the procedure. Procedures were divided into 4 phases: prerobot, docking, console time, and postrobot.

Results

A total of 2012 flow disruptions were observed, with an average rate of 16.27 events per hour. The highest rate was during the robot docking phase. Although the frequency of disruption types varied across phases, the most severe disruptions were related to communication and coordination during the prerobot and docking phase. Equipment- and communication-related disruptions were mostly severe during the time the surgeons were on the console. Among the surgeons, we identified a significant relationship between disruptions and intraoperative teamwork such that during procedures with frequent severe disruptions, surgeons experienced inferior teamwork (β = −0.40, P = .01). This was not the case for nurses and anesthetists.

Conclusion

Emphasis on improving operating room team communication and coordination would help to establish efficient and smooth surgical workflow.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
 Funding Support: The study was co-funded by the Munich Centre for Health Sciences (Mc-Health) and the Bavarian Research Alliance (BAYFOR). Data collection was part of the Master Thesis Requirements of Jeannette Weber (LMU University, Munich).
 Ethical approval: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Munich University (539-11).
 Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


© 2018  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 114

P. 105-113 - avril 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Expression of ZMYND15 in Testes of Azoospermic Men and Association With Sperm Retrieval
  • Motahare-Sadat Hashemi, Hossein Mozdarani, Kamran Ghaedi, Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Editorial Comment
  • Zachary Klaassen

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.