S'abonner

Temporal trends in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates in 50- to 74-year-old persons: a population-based study - 13/04/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.027 
Sanjay K. Murthy, MD, MSc 1, 2, 3, , Eric I. Benchimol, MD, PhD 3, 6, 7, Jill Tinmouth, MD, PhD 3, 4, 5, Paul D. James, MD, MSc 1, 2, Robin Ducharme, MSc 2, 3, Alaa Rostom, MD, MSc 1, 2, Catherine Dubé, MD, MSc 1, 2
1 Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 
2 Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 
3 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Toronto) and ICES uOttawa, Ontario, Canada 
4 Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
5 Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
6 Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 
7 Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 

Reprint requests: Sanjay K. Murthy, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Unit W1212, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6.Assistant Professor of MedicineUniversity of OttawaThe Ottawa Hospital501 Smyth Road, Unit W1212OttawaOntarioK1H 8L6Canada

Abstract

Background and Aims

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) diagnosed between 6 and 36 months after colonoscopy, termed postcolonoscopy CRCs (PCCRCs), arise primarily due to missed or inadequately treated neoplasms during colonoscopy. Introduction of multiple quality indicators and technological advances to colonoscopy practice should have reduced the PCCRC rate over time. We assessed temporal trends in the population rate of PCCRC as a measure of changing colonoscopy quality.

Methods

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of persons aged 50 to 74 years without advanced risk factors for CRC who underwent complete colonoscopy in Ontario, Canada between 1996 and 2010. We defined the PCCRC rate as the proportion of individuals diagnosed with CRC within 36 months of colonoscopy that had PCCRC. We compared age-adjusted and sex-adjusted rates of PCCRC over time based on 3 periods (1996-2001, 2001-2006 and 2006-2010) and assessed the independent association between time period and PCCRC risk through multivariable regression, with respect to all PCCRCs, proximal PCCRC and distal PCCRC.

Results

There was a marked increase in colonoscopy volumes over the study period, particularly in younger age groups and non-hospital settings. Among 1,093,658 eligible persons the PCCRC rate remained stable at approximately 8% over the 15-year study period. The adjusted odds of PCCRC, distal PCCRC and proximal PCCRC, comparing the 2006 to 2010 period with the 1996 to 2001 period, were 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.31), 1.11 (95% CI, 0.91-1.34), and 1.14 (95% CI, 0.94-1.38), respectively. Temporal trends in PCCRC risk did not differ by endoscopist specialty or institutional setting after covariate adjustment.

Conclusion

The PCCRC rate in Ontario has remained consistently high over time. Widespread initiatives are needed to improve colonoscopy quality.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations : CRC, ICES, PCCRC


Plan


 DISCLOSURE: This study was funded by a research grant to Sanjay Murthy provided by the Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa. Eric Benchimol is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and Crohn’s and Colitis Canada, and from the Career Enhancement Program of the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program. Jill Tinmouth is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Embedded Clinician Researcher Award. This study was conducted at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this article are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES or the Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of CIHI. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
 If you would like to chat with an author of this article, you may contact Dr Murthy at smurthy@toh.on.ca.


© 2018  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 87 - N° 5

P. 1324 - mai 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Comparison of the diagnostic performance between magnifying chromoendoscopy and magnifying narrow-band imaging for superficial colorectal neoplasms: an online survey
  • Taku Sakamoto, Takeshi Nakajima, Takahisa Matsuda, Yoshitaka Murakami, Hideki Ishikawa, Kenshi Yao, Yutaka Saito
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Ethics in publication, part 2: duplicate publishing, salami slicing, and large retrospective multicenter case series
  • Michael B. Wallace, Deborah Bowman, Hilary Hamilton-Gibbs, Peter D. Siersema

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.