Among Low-Risk Patients, Does Functional Testing Decrease Referrals for Invasive Coronary Angiography Compared With Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography? - 25/05/19
Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.08.444
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Plan
| Editor’s Note: This is a clinical synopsis, a regular feature of the Annals' Systematic Review Snapshot (SRS) series. The source for this systematic review snapshot is: Siontis GCM, Mavridis D, Greenwood JP, et al. Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2018;360:k504. |
|
| This review does not reflect the views or opinions of the US government, Department of Defense or its Components, US Army, US Air Force, or SAUSHEC EM Residency Program. |
|
| Jestin N. Carlson, MD, MS, and Alan Jones, MD, serve as editors of the SRS series. |
© 2018
American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 73 - N° 6
P. 617-619 - juin 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Associated With Shorter Compression Pauses Compared With Transthoracic Echocardiography
- James Fair, Michael P. Mallin, Aaron Adler, Patrick Ockerse, Jacob Steenblik, Joseph Tonna, Scott T. Youngquist
- Do Mechanical Chest Compression Devices Compared With High-Quality Manual Chest Compressions Improve Neurologically Intact Survival of Patients Who Experience Cardiac Arrest?
- Brit Long, Michael D. April
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?