Reply to “Comment on ‘Histopathologic features distinguishing secondary syphilis from its mimickers’” - 23/07/20
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.106
Alexandra Flamm, MD a, ⁎ 
, Veronica Merelo Alcocer, MD a, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya, MD, PhD b, Eun Ji Kwon, MD c, Dirk Elston, MD d
, Veronica Merelo Alcocer, MD a, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya, MD, PhD b, Eun Ji Kwon, MD c, Dirk Elston, MD d a Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Dermatology, Pennsylvania
b University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Pennsylvania
c Dermpath Diagnostics New York, Port Chester
d University of South Carolina, Department of Dermatology, Charleston
∗Correspondence to: Alexandra Flamm, MD, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Dermatology, 500 University Dr, Mail Code HU14, Hershey, PA 17033Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical CenterDermatology500 University Dr, Mail Code HU14HersheyPA17033
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
| Funding sources: None. |
|
| Conflicts of interest: None disclosed. |
|
| IRB approval status: Not applicable. |
|
| Reprints not available from the authors. |
© 2020
American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 83 - N° 2
P. e137 - août 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Comment on “Histopathologic features distinguishing secondary syphilis from its mimickers”
- Sébastien Menzinger, Sylvie Fraitag
- Recurring transient lymphadenopathy after microneedling with platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia
- Cemile Tu?ba Altunel, A. Tülin Güleç
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?