Preoperative parathyroid localization does not improve surgical outcomes for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism - 05/09/20

Abstract |
Background |
Most patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergo localization prior to operation with variable success. Therefore, in this study we investigated the safety of parathyroidectomy without imaging.
Methods |
A prospective database of 2057 surgical patients with primary hyperparathyroidism from 2001 to 2019 was reviewed. Patients were categorized by use of preoperative imaging (ultrasound, sestamibi, CT scan), pathology, and cure.
Results |
1879 (91%) patients underwent preoperative imaging. CT scan was the most sensitive study (92%), though specificity was only 64%. Patients with imaging were older, had higher pre- and postoperative calcium, more likely to undergo unilateral exploration and have an adenoma (p < 0.001–0.038). No differences were seen in nerve injury (<1%), postoperative hypocalcemia (<1%), or cure rate.
Conclusions |
While localization may lead to minimally-invasive operations, we observed no differences in postoperative complications or cure rates in the hands of an experienced surgeon. Therefore, preoperative parathyroid localization does not improve outcomes for hyperparathyroidism and can be ordered sparingly.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Accepted practice is to obtain routine imaging for preoperative localization for parathyroidectomy. |
• | Parathyroid imaging is variable in its accuracy and can increase the total cost of care for primary hyperparathyroidism. |
• | Imageless parathyroidectomy is shown to have a high rate of cure with low complication rates. |
Keywords : Primary hyperparathyroidism, Parathyroidectomy, Localization, Imaging, Outcomes
Plan
Vol 220 - N° 3
P. 533-535 - septembre 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
