S'abonner

Ethics of life-sustaining treatment in locked-in syndrome: A Chinese survey - 29/11/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.09.011 
Yifan Yan a, 1, Athena Demertzi b, 1, Yinyan Xia a, Jing Wang a, Nantu Hu a, , Zhiliang Zhang a, Haibo Di a, , Steven Laureys c
a International Unresponsive Wakefulness and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China 
b GIGA Research, GIGA-Consciousness, Physiology of Cognition Research Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium 
c GIGA Research, GIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University & University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium 

Corresponding author.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Highlights

A survey of people in China thought that life-sustaining treatment should not be stopped in individuals with chronic locked-in syndrome. Especially neurologists thought that it might also be unnecessary to withdraw life-sustaining treatment because the locked-in syndrome is not terminal or irreversible.
The survey did not identify a dissociation between personal preferences and general opinions, possibly because of a social uniformity in China where individualism is less pronounced.
Families experience the stress of caring for individuals with locked-in syndrome. The quality-of-life score was lower for relatives than non-relatives.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Background

Locked-in syndrome (LIS) characterizes individuals who have experienced pontine lesions, who have limited motor output but with preserved cognitive abilities. Despite their severe physical impairment, individuals with LIS self-profess a higher quality of life than generally expected. Such third-person expectations about LIS are shaped by personal and cultural factors in western countries.

Objective

We sought to investigate whether such opinions are further influenced by the cultural background in East Asia. We surveyed attitudes about the ethics of life-sustaining treatment in LIS in a cohort of medical and non-medical Chinese participants.

Results

The final study sample included 1545 respondents: medical professionals (n=597, 39%), neurologists (n=303, 20%), legal professionals (n=276, 18%) and other professionals (n=369, 24%), including 180 family members of individuals with LIS. Most of the participants (70%), especially neurologists, thought that life-sustaining treatment could not be stopped in individuals with LIS. It might be unnecessary to withdraw life-sustaining treatment, because the condition involved is not terminal and irreversible, and physical treatment can be beneficial for the patient. A significant proportion (59%) of respondents would like to be kept alive if they were in that condition; however, older people thought the opposite. Families experience the stress of caring for individuals with LIS. The mean (SD) quality of life score for relatives was 0.73 (2.889) (on a −5, +5 scale), which was significantly lower than that of non-relatives, 1.75 (1.969) (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Differences in opinions about end of life in LIS are affected by personal characteristics. The current survey did not identify a dissociation between personal preferences and general opinions, potentially because of a social uniformity in China where individualism is less pronounced. Future open-ended surveys could identify specific needs of caregivers so that strategic interventions to reduce ethical debasement are designed.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : End-of-life, Locked-in syndrome, Survey, Attitude, Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome


Plan


© 2019  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 63 - N° 6

P. 483-487 - novembre 2020 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Synergic regenerative effects of polydeoxyribonucleotide and microcurrent on full-thickness rotator cuff healing in a rabbit model
  • Dong Rak Kwon, Yong Suk Moon
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Urinary and fecal incontinence in stroke survivors followed in general practice: A retrospective cohort study
  • Louis Jacob, Karel Kostev

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.