Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Urinary Stone Disease Management in a Large Urban US Population - 24/07/21
, Cameron Futral 1, Caroline A Miller 1, Rupali Bose 4, James Kearns 1, Peter E Clark 1, Ornob P Roy 1Résumé |
Objective |
To determine the influence of socioeconomic parameters on urinary stone surgeries.
Methods |
A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing urolithiasis surgery in our community network hospital in North Carolina from 2005-2018.
Results |
Of 7731 patients, 2160 (28%), 5,174 (67%), and 397 (5%) underwent SWL, URS, and PCNL, respectively. A higher proportion of Whites underwent URS (67%) and SWL (74%) than PCNL (56%); whereas a larger percentage of Blacks underwent PCNL (24%) than URS (20%) and SWL (15%) groups (P <.001). Private insurance payers were greater in the SWL (95%) group than URS (80%) and PCNL (81%) (P <.001). The distribution of median income was significantly different amongst the 3 surgeries with higher income classes overutilizing SWL and underutilizing PCNL compared to lower income classes (P <.001). In linear regression modeling, the proportion of SWL in a postal code was positively associated with median income (R2=0.55, P <.001); URS and PCNL were negatively associated with median income (R2=0.40, P <.001 and R2=0.41, P <.001, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression modeling, Blacks were significantly more likely to undergo PCNL than Whites (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.74 P <.050). Private insurance payers were more likely to undergo SWL (aOR 11.0, 95% CI 7.26-16.8, P <.0001) than public insurance payers. Patients in higher median income brackets are significantly less likely to undergo PCNL than those in the <$40,000 income bracket (P <.0001).
Conclusion |
Our study suggests that socioeconomic status impacts urolithiasis surgical management, underscoring disparity recognition importance in endourologic care and ensuring appropriate surgical care regardless of socioeconomic status.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : SWL, URS, PCNL, Aor, CI
Plan
| Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. |
|
| Funding Sources: There was no outside funding regarding the publication of this paper. |
|
| Statement of Ethics: This manuscript has not been published in whole or part elsewhere nor currently being considered for publication in another journal. All authors have been personally and actively involved in the publication of this paper and will hold themselves jointly and individually responsible for its content. Personal and identifying information regarding the case has be retracted for confidentiality purposes. |
|
| Disclosure Statement: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper. |
Vol 153
P. 93-100 - juillet 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
