Editorial: Benign Versus Problematic Media Use Profiles in Youth: Correlates, Concerns, and Future Directions - 29/08/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.05.009

Lauren Eales, MA ^a, Andrea Wiglesworth, MA ^b, Bonnie Klimes-Dougan, PhD ^b, Kathryn R. Cullen, MD ^c,^⁎
^a College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
^b College of Liberal Arts, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
^c University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota

^∗Correspondence to Kathryn R. Cullen, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, 2025 East River Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55414Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMasonic Institute for the Developing Brain2025 East River ParkwayMinneapolisMN55414

Résumé

The potential impact of screen media activity (SMA) on youth development is a topic of heated debate, with inconsistent findings and concerns about SMA measurement.¹ There is a growing call for more precise measurement and analyses of SMA, focusing more on how (in what way youth are using screens) and less on how much (aggregate screen time). There is also a need to distinguish normative vs problematic SMA (eg, addiction-like behaviors)^2,3 in youth. In the current issue, Song et al.⁴ advance this field by using a sophisticated assessment of SMA, considering problematic vs benign SMA profiles, and exploring associations between SMA and measures of brain and behavior.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

	The authors have reported no funding for this work.
	Author Contributions Conceptualization: Eales, Wiglesworth, Klimes-Dougan, Cullen Writing – original draft: Eales, Wiglesworth, Klimes-Dougan, Cullen Writing – review and editing: Eales, Wiglesworth, Klimes-Dougan, Cullen
	Disclosure: Dr. Klimes-Dougan has received research funding through the University of Minnesota. Dr. Cullen has received grant/research support from the University of Minnesota, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Endowment for the Arts, and the Minnesota State Arts Board. She has received honoraria from NIH and the Food and Drug Administration (also served as consultant). She has reported editorship/editorial board of BJPsych Open. Ms. Wiglesworth has received a grant from the National Science Foundation. Ms. Eales has reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
	All statements expressed in this column are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. See the Guide for Authors for information about the preparation and submission of Editorials.

Export

Vol 62 - N° 9

P. 970-972 - septembre 2023 Retour au numéro

Article précédent

Editorial: A Better Perspective on Antipsychotic-Related Hyperprolactinemia in Children and Adolescents
Jeffrey R. Strawn, Thomas D. Geracioti

| Article suivant

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: International Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation and Attempt in Youth
Anna R. Van Meter, Ellen A. Knowles, Emily H. Mintz

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

connectez-vous ou créez un compte

Editorial: Benign Versus Problematic Media Use Profiles in Youth: Correlates, Concerns, and Future Directions - 29/08/23

Résumé

Export citations

Fichier

Contenu

Accès rapides

Mon compte

Aide & support

Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL