S'abonner

Predicting primary cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus - 28/10/23

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.002 
Sebastian Z. Ramos, MD a, , Adam K. Lewkowitz, MD, MPHS a, Megan G. Lord, MD a, Phinnara Has, MS b, Valery A. Danilack, PhD, MPH c, David A. Savitz, PhD a, d, Erika F. Werner, MD, MS a, e
a Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 
b Lifespan Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 
c Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 
d Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 
e Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University, Boston, MA 

Corresponding author: Sebastian Z. Ramos, MD.

Abstract

Background

Prediction models have shown promise in helping clinicians and patients engage in shared decision-making by providing quantitative estimates of individual risk of important clinical outcomes. Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common complication of pregnancy, which places patients at higher risk of primary CD. Suspected fetal macrosomia diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound is a well-known risk factor for primary CD in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus, but tools incorporating multiple risk factors to provide more accurate CD risk are lacking. Such tools could help facilitate shared decision-making and risk reduction by identifying patients with both high and low chances of intrapartum primary CD.

Objective

This study aimed to develop and internally validate a multivariable model to estimate the risk of intrapartum primary CD in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus undergoing a trial of labor.

Study Design

This study identified a cohort of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus derived from a large, National Institutes of Health–funded medical record abstraction study who delivered singleton live-born infants at ≥34 weeks of gestation at a large tertiary care center between January 2002 and March 2013. The exclusion criteria included previous CD, contraindications to vaginal delivery, scheduled primary CD, and known fetal anomalies. Candidate predictors were clinical variables routinely available to a practitioner in the third trimester of pregnancy found to be associated with an increased risk of CD in gestational diabetes mellitus. Stepwise backward elimination was used to build the logistic regression model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to demonstrate goodness of fit. Model discrimination was evaluated via the concordance index and displayed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Internal model validation was performed with bootstrapping of the original dataset. Random resampling with replacement was performed for 1000 replications to assess predictive ability. An additional analysis was performed in which the population was stratified by parity to evaluate the model’s predictive ability among nulliparous and multiparous individuals.

Results

Of the 3570 pregnancies meeting the study criteria, 987 (28%) had a primary CD. Of note, 8 variables were included in the final model, all significantly associated with CD. They included large for gestational age, polyhydramnios, older maternal age, early pregnancy body mass index, first hemoglobin A1C recorded in pregnancy, nulliparity, insulin treatment, and preeclampsia. Model calibration and discrimination were satisfactory with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P=.862) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.77). Internal validation demonstrated similar discriminatory ability. Stratification by parity demonstrated that the model worked well among both nulliparous and multiparous patients.

Conclusion

Using information routinely available in the third trimester of pregnancy, a clinically pragmatic model can predict intrapartum primary CD risk with reasonable reliability in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus and may provide quantitative data to guide patients in understanding their individual primary CD risk based on preexisting and acquired risk factors.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Video


(10.58 Mo)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : gestational diabetes, mode of delivery, prediction model, primary CD


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This study received funding from the National Institutes of Health (grant number: 1R01HD077592; principal investigator: D.A.S.).
 S.Z.R. is supported by the NIH)/Office of Research on Women’s Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health (grant number: 5K12HD092535). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
 The study’s abstract was presented virtually as an oral concurrent presentation at the 42nd annual pregnancy meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, January 31, 2022, to February 5, 2022.
 Cite this article as: Ramos SZ, Lewkowitz AK, Lord MG, et al. Predicting primary CD in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023;229:549.e1-16.


© 2023  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 229 - N° 5

P. 549.e1-549.e16 - novembre 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index
  • Jason Gardosi, Oliver Hugh
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Impact of household income and Special Supplemental Nutritional Program for Women, Infants, and Children on feeding decisions for infants in the United States
  • Alexandra M. Abbate, Alexander M. Saucedo, Jordyn Pike, Jeny Ghartey, Stephanie Nutt, Nandini Raghuraman, Lorie M. Harper, Alison G. Cahill

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.