Euthanasia stands as an enduring and polarizing subject within medical ethics, the contentious nature of this topic emanates from the clash between a physician's duty to preserve life and alleviate suffering. This study provides valuable insights into the perspective of medical students and staff, examining their awareness levels, attitudes, and readiness regarding euthanasia. Notably, the research is framed within the unique context of the Middle East, challenging the predominantly Western influence on end-of-life decision studies. This study is the first of its kind to examine a Middle Eastern perspective on euthanasia, emphasizing its relevance and novelty. It highlights both the obstacles to its implementation and the rationales for endorsing it, while also pinpointing the significant factors linked to this complex subject.

This multicenter cross-sectional study enrolled 646 individuals, including medical students and staff. The study encompassed all six medical facilities in the, as well as multiple hospitals across Jordan.

The median age of the study participants was 21 years old (21–22). The analysis showed that 30.3% of the participants expressed support for euthanasia. Designation was significantly associated with awareness and readiness. Religious activity was associated with attitude, while religion was associated with readiness. In this current study, participants displayed a pessimistic stance regarding euthanasia. The primary reasons for opposition included concerns about its potential misuse for personal gain, as well as the impact of religious or cultural beliefs.

The present research significantly contributes to the global discourse on euthanasia, offering a comprehensive glimpse into how medical practitioners and students in Jordan navigate this intricate issue.