Multilevel Interventions That Protect and Promote Youth Autonomy Could Reduce Depression at Scale - 26/02/25
, Kathryn R. Fox, PhD bRésumé |
Depression is a major public health problem among adolescents and preadolescents in the United States. Clinical scientists have spent considerable resources designing and testing depression interventions. Some programs can prevent and reduce depression to a modest degree,1 while others show null or potentially adverse impacts on youth mental health.2 However, due to low access to treatment for depression (more than 50% of adolescents with depression symptoms never access treatment at all3) and the heterogeneity of depressive symptoms, no interventions have led to meaningful declines in the overall burdens of depression for adolescents.4 In high school students, rates of self-reported persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness and suicidal thoughts and behaviors increased between 2011 and 2021 in the United States.5 Status quo approaches are unlikely to sustainably improve adolescent depression. We propose that a critical and often overlooked contributor to this shortfall is youth autonomy—a key, developmentally aligned need for adolescents—to reduce rates of depression at the population level. During adolescence, individuals begin to separate from their parents, guardians, and caregivers (hereafter caregivers) and make decisions independently. This process is critical for healthy identity formation, self-efficacy, and mental health, including prevention and reduction of depression.6 Youth autonomy is among myriad multilevel factors (eg, social connectedness, food and housing insecurity, adversity exposure) relevant to depression trajectories. However, in contrast to many social and structural contributors to depression, perceived autonomy of youths is relatively modifiable through individual-level intervention, making it a promising intervention target. The psychosocial importance of youth autonomy stands in sharp contrast to modern policies and structures that undermine youth independence and control—including within many existing depression interventions.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| J.L.S. has received funding from the National Institute of Health Office of the Director (DP5OD028123), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (R43MH128075), the Upswing Fund for Adolescent Mental Health, the National Science Foundation (2141710), the Health Research and Services Association (U3NHP45406-01-00), the Society for Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, HopeLab, Child Mind Institute, and the Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation. Preparation of this article was supported in part by the Implementation Research Institute (IRI) at the George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, through an award from NIMH (R25MH080916; J.L.S. is an IRI Fellow). |
|
| Disclosure: Dr. Schleider has served on the Scientific Advisory Board for Walden Wise and the Clinical Advisory Board for Koko; has received consulting fees from UnitedHealth Group, Woebot, Kooth, and TikTok; is Co-Founder and Co-Director of Single Session Support Solutions; and has received book royalties from New Harbinger, Oxford University Press, and Little Brown Book Group. Dr. Fox has reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. |
|
| All statements expressed in this column are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. See the Guide for Authors for information about the preparation and submission of Commentaries. |
Vol 64 - N° 3
P. 318-320 - mars 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
