Utility of plasma GFAP as a secondary endpoint for clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease - 05/06/25

for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder
Abstract |
Background |
Clinical trials have recently incorporated plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as an exploratory endpoint. To include plasma GFAP as a secondary endpoint, it is essential to characterize its longitudinal progression in target populations.
Objective |
To evaluate the potential use of plasma GFAP changes as a secondary endpoint in Alzheimer’s disease trials.
Methods |
We longitudinally evaluated plasma GFAP in individuals with amyloid-beta (Aβ)-PET scans at baseline in three well-characterized cohorts. Cox proportional hazards regression tested the association between changes in plasma GFAP and cognitive function. Analysis of the 95 % confidence interval of annualized change in plasma GFAP provided statistical inference for a significant longitudinal change. Effect size was calculated as the group mean divided by the standard deviation (SD). We estimated the sample size needed to test a 25% drug effect with 80% power on reducing changes in GFAP.
Results |
We assessed 487 individuals [176 cognitively unimpaired (CU; 29% Aβ positive) and 311 cognitively impaired (CI; 51% Aβ positive)] with some degree of cerebrovascular disease (Fazekas 1–3), over a mean (SD) follow-up of 1.84 (0.46) years. Changes in plasma GFAP were significantly associated with worsening in Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-SB) score across the population (p < 0.0001). In CU, only Aβ positive individuals showed significant changes in GFAP (p < 0.001). On the other hand, both CI Aβ positive and negative individuals showed longitudinal progression in GFAP levels (p < 0.0001). The effect size of changes in plasma GFAP was higher in CU Aβ positive (0.44), followed by CI Aβ positive (0.42) and CI Aβ negative (0.38). Clinical trials focusing on CU Aβ positive would require 1320 individuals per study arm, while focusing on CI Aβ positive would require 1440 individuals per study arm.
Conclusion |
Plasma GFAP increased in parallel with cognitive decline, making it a candidate for monitoring disease progression in trials aimed at mitigating cognitive deterioration. Although Aβ positivity significantly accelerated GFAP progression, the fact that GFAP was increased in CI Aβ negative with cerebrovascular disease supports its potential use as a secondary endpoint in this population as well.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Plasma GFAP, Biomarker, Clinical trial
Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
