Single-dose intravenous iron vs oral iron for treatment of maternal iron deficiency anemia: a randomized clinical trial - 25/07/25

on behalf of the
RAPIDIRON Trial Group (Appendix)
Abstract |
Background |
Maternal iron deficiency anemia is a persistent global health challenge with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Obstetric guidelines advocate for first-line treatment of moderate iron deficiency anemia with twice-daily oral iron; however, rates of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy remain above global targets and are rising.
Objective |
Determine whether single-dose intravenous iron for primary treatment of maternal iron deficiency anemia in the second trimester is superior to twice daily oral iron in reducing incidence of low birth weight infants and maternal anemia at delivery.
Study Design |
This is a parallel, 3-arm, semiblind superiority randomized controlled multicenter trial across 4 sites in India from March 15, 2021–May 12, 2023. Participants were singleton pregnancies at 14 to 17 weeks with moderate iron deficiency anemia (hemoglobin 7.0–9.9 g/dL) who were randomized 1:1:1 to (1) 60 mg oral ferrous sulfate twice daily; or single-dose infusion of (2) intravenous ferric derisomaltose or (3) intravenous ferric carboxymaltose. Two intravenous arms were selected as these are the only 2 intravenous iron formulations publicly available in India. All participants received folic acid supplementation throughout pregnancy and antihelminthic therapy, as recommended by national guidelines. The dual primary outcomes were: (1) low birth weight (<2500 grams) and (2) attainment of a maternal nonanemic state (hemoglobin ≥11.0 g/dL at 30–34 weeks or delivery) for each intravenous iron arm vs oral iron; intravenous iron arms were not compared to each other. Secondary outcomes included safety measures, and other maternal and infant outcomes. Participants with hemoglobin <7 g/dL or <1 g/dL improvement on therapy received rescue treatment with intravenous iron or blood transfusion as determined by their provider. Sensitivity analyses included defining nonanemic state as achieving hemoglobin ≥11.0 without need for additional IV iron or transfusion. Comparison of each intravenous iron arm to oral iron was conducted with a 2-sided alpha set at 0.0005 for achieving nonanemic state and 0.0245 for low birth weight for each intravenous iron arm using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test stratified by enrollment site.
Results |
The oral iron, ferric derisomaltose, and ferric carboxymaltose arms included 1450, 1456, and 1462 participants respectively. There was a reduced rate of low birth weight with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (25·2%, relative risk 0·87 [97·55% confidence interval 0.75, 0.99], P =.017), but not intravenous ferric derisomaltose (29.1%, relative risk 0.98 [97.55% confidence interval 0.86, 1.12], P =.71) vs oral iron (29.3%). Achievement of nonanemic state was not improved: intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (relative risk 1.05 [99.95% confidence interval 0.97–1.15]) and intravenous ferric derisomaltose (relative risk 1.06 [99.95% confidence interval 0.98, 1.16]) vs oral (69.7%). In sensitivity analysis, there was increased rate of achieving nonanemic state without use of additional IV iron or transfusion in both intravenous ferric derisomaltose (relative risk 1.25 (1.13–1.396), P < .0001) and intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (relative risk 1.24 (1.12–1.38), P < .0001) vs oral iron.
Conclusion |
First-line treatment of moderate maternal iron deficiency anemia with single-dose infusion of intravenous iron results in a reduced incidence of low birth weight infants (intravenous ferric carboxymaltose vs oral) and a higher incidence of attaining maternal nonanemic state without use of additional iron or blood transfusion (intravenous ferric carboxymaltose and ferric derisomaltose vs oral). Clinical guidelines should address the potential benefit of single-dose intravenous iron as the primary treatment of moderate iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : anemia, global health, intravenous iron, iron deficiency anemia, maternal anemia, pregnancy
Plan
| R.C.B. has declared grant support from the Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF). She also declares grant support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) for a study on postpartum IV iron to iron deficiency anemia, where she serves as a co-investigator. She has received the COVIS Pharma Investigator Sponsored Research Award for a study on early antenatal support for iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial (that IV iron formulation is ferumoxytol, not studied in this manuscript). Additionally, she received the Pharmacosmos Investigator Sponsored Research Award for 2022 to 2023 to explore the impact of maternal anemia on COVID-19 immunity; Pharmacosmos is the manufacturer of Monoferric (IV ferric derisomaltose), that award was not related to IV iron therapy. M.B.B. has declared the receipt of 70 vials of ferric carboxymaltose 500 mg from Emcure Pharma and 70 vials of ferric derisomaltose/IIM from LUPIN for a resident physician's university-assigned dissertation work. The funders were not involved in data analysis, and the results are yet to be published (2020–2022). R.J.D. has declared grant support from NIH , Foundation for the NIH ( FNIH ), CIFF , BMGF , and the Thrasher Foundation . C.S., R Frasso, B.E.L., S.T., P Lalakia, and J Bradford-Rogers have declared grant support from CIFF and BMGF . A Patted has declared grant support from BMGF . M.G. has declared grant support from NIH and BMGF , royalty payments from an UpToDate article on infants of diabetic mothers, expert consultant fees for the RAPIDIRON trial funded by CIFF, payments from the WIC program by the State of Minnesota, and participation on the DSMB for the University of Maryland's NIH-funded study on hippocampal development. S.M. has declared expert consultant fees to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the RAPIDIRON trial funded by CIFF. He has also declared personal investments in index mutual funds, which may include pharmaceutical companies, ensuring broad statistical representation of the market; he has no control over the selection of companies. M.S.S., S.B., S.M., S.M., D.K.S., S.Y., U.C., A.P.P., A.A.M., U.R., R.S., P.P., S.R., P.V., R.L.H., and Z.A. report no conflict of interest. |
|
| This study was funded by the Children's Investment Fund Foundation (Grant number: 1811-03347 ). The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation, or writing of this manuscript. |
|
| This study was presented as a late breaking oral presentation at the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine Annual Meeting Jan. 31, 2025. |
|
| Cite this article as: Derman RJ, Bellad MB, Somannavar MS, et al. Single-dose intravenous iron vs oral iron for treatment of maternal iron deficiency anemia: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025;233:120.e1-18. |
|
| Trial registration: This study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI/2020/09/027730) on September 10, 2020, prior to enrollment of the first participant (March 15, 2021) pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NDY4MDE=&Enc=&userName= . |
Vol 233 - N° 2
P. 120.e1-120.e18 - août 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
