S'abonner

A new perinatal quality measure in nulliparous term singleton vertex births: integrating cesarean rate, maternal, and neonatal outcomes into a single maternal-newborn dyadic metric - 09/01/26

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.05.016 
Frank I. Jackson, DO a, b, c, ⁎ , Anthony M. Vintzileos, MD a, c, d, Sarah H. Abelman, MD a, b, c, Fernando Suarez, BS a, Adriann Combs, DNP-BC a, Victor Klein, MD c, e, f, Adi Davidov, MD c, g, Burton L. Rochelson, MD c, e, f, Matthew J. Blitz, MD, MBA a, b, c, h
a Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY 
b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Shore University Hospital, Bay Shore, NY 
c Zucker School of Medicine, Uniondale, NY 
d Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY 
e Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY 
f Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Long Island Jewish Hospital, New Hyde Park, NY 
g Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Staten Island University Hospital, New York, NY 
h Institute of Health Systems Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY 

∗ Corresponding author: Frank I. Jackson, DO.

Abstract

Background

Traditionally, hospital perinatal quality and rankings have been based on cesarean rates among nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex patients, and hospitals have recently added unexpected term newborn complication rates as a separate outcome category. The drawbacks of this methodology are two-fold: first, maternal complications are not considered and second, the maternal-newborn outcomes, which may not be aligned with each other, are reported separately.

Objective

The objectives were to: 1) evaluate the relationships between cesarean, maternal and neonatal complication rates in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex patients; 2) develop unified measures incorporating cesarean, maternal, and neonatal complications, utilizing desirability of outcome ranking methodology, to evaluate individual hospital performances; and 3) compare hospital rankings using the most desirable dyadic outcome “vaginal delivery with no maternal and no neonatal complications” to cesarean rate–based rankings for the overall population, as well as for low- and high-risk patients.

Study Design

This retrospective cross-sectional study included all nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex deliveries at 7 hospitals of the Northwell Health system from January 2019 to December 2024. Maternal complications included “severe obstetric complications” as per the Joint Commission criteria. Neonatal complications included the conditions described by the Joint Commission as “unexpected complications in term newborns.” First, statistical analyses were performed to evaluate correlations among cesarean, maternal, and neonatal complication rates in the 7 hospitals. Second, we employed dyadic maternal-newborn outcomes using a desirability of outcome ranking integrating cesarean, maternal, and neonatal complication rates for each hospital. Third, we used the most desirable outcome, “vaginal delivery with no maternal and no neonatal complications” to derive a new seven-hospital ranking which was then compared to the cesarean rate–based ranking. The same comparisons of rankings were also performed after stratification of the data to low- and high-risk patients based on the obstetric comorbidity index score on admission (0–3 and ≥4, respectively).

Results

A total of 55,841 nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex deliveries during the years 2019 to 2024 were analyzed. There was a significant negative correlation between cesarean and neonatal complication rates (r=−0.79, P =.04), and no correlations between cesarean vs maternal complication rates (r=−0.08, P =.86) or maternal complication vs neonatal complication rates (r=−0.33, P =.47) indicating the need for a combined metric. Based on the desirability of outcome ranking methodology, 4 groups of dyadic outcomes were formed: a) vaginal delivery with no maternal and no neonatal complications; b) cesarean with no maternal and no neonatal complications; c) vaginal delivery with maternal and/or neonatal complications; and d) cesarean with maternal and/or neonatal complications. The rates of dyadic outcomes were recorded for each hospital and the best possible dyadic outcome (vaginal delivery with no maternal and no neonatal complications) was used to create a new hospital ranking which was then compared with the (referent) cesarean rate-based ranking. There were significant changes in the overall ranking based on the new maternal-newborn dyadic measure: 2/7 (29%) hospitals changed ranking in the overall population (Kendall Tau 0.905, P =.002); 3/7 (43%) in the low-risk group (Kendall Tau 0.810, P =.01); and 5/7 (71%) in the high-risk group (Kendall Tau 0.714, P =.03).

Conclusion

The study demonstrates the need for a dyadic maternal-newborn perinatal quality measures that incorporates cesarean rates, maternal and neonatal complication rates. Our findings suggest that separate reliance on cesarean or neonatal complication rates may provide an inaccurate representation of perinatal care quality. We propose that our Northwell composite dyadic measure “vaginal delivery with no maternal and no neonatal complications” allows for a comprehensive assessment of quality of perinatal care.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Video


(13.75 Mo)

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : desirability-based outcome ranking, DOOR, Joint Commission, hospital performance, maternal complications, neonatal complications, neonatal intensive care admission, patient-centered care, perinatal care core measures, ranking, severe maternal morbidity, unexpected term newborn complications


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This work was funded by the departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology at South Shore University Hospital, Lenox Hill Hospital, North Shore University Hospital, Long Island Jewish Hospital, and Staten Island University Hospital.


© 2025  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 233 - N° 6S

P. S46-S54 - janvier 2026 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Pre-operative ultrasound before cesarean delivery: reviewing findings during the first surgical time-out to improve maternal and infant safety
  • Roberto Romero, Piya Chaemsaithong, Awoniyi O. Awonuga, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa, Arun Meyyazhagan, Juan Pedro Kusanovic, Anthony M. Vintzileos
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The Stark (Misgav Ladach) cesarean delivery—a streamlined surgical technique: development, rationale, and clinical outcomes
  • Michael Stark

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.