Personalized positive-end expiratory pressure using electrical impedance tomography in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis - 10/03/26
, Gilda Cinnella a, 2Highlights |
• | EIT-guided PEEP titration improves oxygenation in patients with ARDS. |
• | Individualized PEEP adjustment using EIT increases respiratory system compliance. |
• | Electrical impedance tomography allows bedside, real-time assessment of lung mechanics. |
• | EIT-guided ventilation supports physiologically individualized PEEP optimization in ARDS. |
Abstract |
Objective |
Personalized mechanical ventilation strategies can improve outcomes in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). However, the optimal method for titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) remains controversial. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT), by enabling real-time, regional assessment of lung regional characteristics, offers potential advantages to guiding PEEP titration as compared to conventional methods.
Data sources and study selection |
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing EIT-guided versus conventional PEEP titration in adult ARDS. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Moreover, the review was conducted in accordance with the MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) recommendations, where applicable, and with the registered protocol (PROSPERO ID: CRD420251015187). The primary outcomes were the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio and respiratory system compliance (Crs). Secondary outcomes included driving pressure (ΔP), mechanical power (MP), and mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias and GRADE assessments were conducted using the ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools, depending on the study design.
Data extraction and data synthesis |
Nine studies (n = 356 patients) were included. EIT-guided PEEP titration was associated with an improvement in oxygenation, expressed as PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, in the EIT guided PEEP group (MD + 60.81; 95% CI 30.37–91.25), with low heterogeneity. Furthermore, significant improvement in respiratory system compliance was observed in EIT guided PEEP (MD + 6.81 mL/cm H 2 O; 95% CI 3.73–9.89). No statistically significant difference was observed in driving pressure between groups (MD −0.78 cm H 2 O; 95% CI −1.63 to 0.07). Mechanical power showed a non-significant difference across groups (MD −0.76 J/min; 95% CI −2.30 to 0.78). Mortality did not differ between groups (risk ratio 0.88; 95% CI 0.45–1.72).
Conclusion |
EIT-guided PEEP titration improves oxygenation and respiratory system compliance in patients with ARDS, supporting its role as a physiology-based strategy for ventilatory personalization. Further evidence are needed to determine whether these physiological improvements translate into better clinical outcomes.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Electrical impedance tomography, ARDS, PEEP titration, Oxygenation, Respiratory compliance, Lung mechanics, Mechanical ventilation, Driving pressure, Mechanical power.
Abbreviations : ARDS, ATS, BMI, CI, COPD, Crs, D MP , ΔP (or DP), EELV, EIT, ESICM, FiO 2 , GI Index, GRADE, ICU, IQR, I², LOA, MD, MP, MPa, OD Index, PaO 2 , PaCO 2 , PaO 2 /FiO 2 (or P/F Ratio) , PEEP, PGA, Pplat, PRISMA, PROSPERO, PV, RCT, Rec Index, ROB 2.0, ROBINS-I, RR, SD, SEM, VILI, Vt
Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
