Developing a metric for bone union in mandibular reconstruction using quantitative CT - 15/03/26
, Timothy Manzie b, c, Charlotte Kenny b, Thomas Kronborg d, Masako Dunn b, c, e, Emma Charters b, e, Boyang Wan b, g, Louise van Camp h, Vinay Tumuluri i, Jonathan R. Clark b, c, e, fHighlights |
• | No objective measure of bone union after mandibular reconstruction exists. |
• | Quantitative CT Hounsfield units were explored to characterize mandibular bone union. |
• | Buccal cortical attenuation showed the strongest association with union across analyses. |
• | Partial bone union was more difficult to classify than non-union or complete union. |
• | Machine learning supported modeling of bone union but showed limited generalizability. |
Abstract |
Background |
Objective quantification of bone union after mandibular reconstruction is important for evaluating reconstructive outcomes, yet current assessments are largely semi-quantitative.
Objective |
To explore the feasibility of using opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (CT)–derived Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements, with and without machine learning, to characterize bone union after fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.
Methods |
In this proof-of-concept diagnostic mandibulectomy patients with variable clinical characteristics were selected from a prospectively maintained database at a quaternary referral center. CT scans from 2020–2024 were analyzed and quantitative HU measurements were obtained from buccal, lingual, and medullary bone at osteotomy sites. Bone union was graded using the Akashi scale. Logistic regression and random forest models were developed for binary and multiclass prediction, with performance assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration metrics, and clustered cross-validation.
Results |
A total of 821 Hounsfield measurements from 280 axial CT slices were analyzed. Interrater agreement for Akashi scoring was 88.6% (κ = 0.79). Buccal HU was the strongest predictor, achieving an AUC of 0.74–0.75 in unadjusted analyses and 0.88–0.89 in adjusted logistic regression models. Random forest models achieved an AUC of 0.86 for union and 0.92 for complete union, with moderate to good calibration. Multiclass models showed good discrimination for non-union and complete union (AUC up to 0.86) but limited performance for partial union (AUC 0.68–0.73). Discriminative performance declined under clustered validation.
Conclusions |
This exploratory study demonstrates the feasibility of using CT attenuation values to quantify bone union after mandibular reconstruction, supporting further validation in larger, multicenter cohorts.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Oral cavity cancer, Mandibular reconstruction, Bone union assessment, Quantitative computed tomography, Hounsfield unit analysis, Fibula free flap reconstruction, Machine learning in imaging
Plan
Vol 127 - N° 4
Article 102770- septembre 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
