The late-onset of veno-occlusive disease after liver transplantation is associated with poorer graft survival - 29/03/26
, Yilmaz Funda d, Saliba Faouzi b, c, e, Kounis Ilias b, c, e, Cherqui Daniel b, c, e, Azoulay Daniel b, c, e, Coilly Audrey b, c, e, Féray Cyrille b, c, eHighlights |
• | Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after liver transplantation mostly described through case reports has uncertain prognostic significance. This large single-center study demonstrates the deleterious impact of the late-onset of VOD on graft survival. The presence of antibody-mediated rejection particularly in late-onset VOD patients is intriguing and requires further investigation. |
Abstract |
Objective |
Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) after liver transplantation mostly described through case reports has uncertain prognostic significance. We aim to determine factors that influence graft survival, and explore the presence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) recently reported in this pathological condition.
Methods |
This single-center study included liver transplant recipients with histologically-confirmed VOD between 2014 and 2021. Retrospective analysis of clinicopathological data was primarily focused on their impact on prognosis then compared between AMR/VOD and non-AMR/VOD patients.
Results |
VOD identified in 39/1471 (2.6%) recipients occurred at a median time of 12.6 months (range: 0.3-328.3 months), most cases (79.5%) within the first 5 years and 20.5% beyond 15 years post-transplant. The probability of graft loss was 50% at 4.5 years post-diagnosis. Donor and recipient age, symptoms at presentation, history of rejection, and treatment provided had no impact on graft survival. Late-onset VOD (> 5 years post-transplant) was associated with a higher risk of graft loss ( P =0.002). AMR preceded VOD in three patients and developed afterward in two. Patients with AMR were younger age at liver transplantation ( P =0.013) and at time of VOD diagnosis ( P =0.006), had higher DSA positivity, were of later-onset VOD ( P =0.001) and more often underwent retransplantation ( P =0.001). There were no significant differences in the sinusoid/centrilobular vein C4d positivity between AMR/VOD and non-AMR/VOD cases.
Conclusion |
We introduced a novel classification of post-transplant VOD cases into early-onset and late-onset, the latter having a poorer prognosis and being more often associated with AMR. The relationship between VOD and AMR requires further investigation.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Liver transplantation, veno-occlusive disease, T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, chronic rejection, prognosis, graft survival, patient survival
Plan
Vol 50 - N° 5
Article 102811- mai 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
