Experts’ recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock - 01/04/26
, Clement Delmas b, c, 1, Hamid Merdji d, Guillaume Schurtz e, Guillaume Baudry f, g, h, Antoine Beurton i, j, Florence Boissier k, l, Laurent Bonello m, Bernard Cholley n, o, Nicolas Combaret f, g, h, Alain Combes p, Charles-Henri David q, Daniel De Backer r, Pierre Grégoire Guinot s, Olfa Hamzaoui t, Brahim Harbaoui u, v, Julien Imbault i, j, Nicolas Nesseler w, Antoine Kimmoun x, Michel Kindo y, Guillaume Lebreton z, Guillaume Leurent aa, Bruno Levy ab, Stéphane Manzo-Silberman ac, ad, Anne-Céline Martin ae, af, Armand Mekontso-Dessap ag, ah, Imane Adda ai, Joy Mootien aj, Alexandre Ouattara ak, Matteo Pozzi al, Etienne Puymirat am, an, Francois Roubille ao, Antonin Trimaille ap, Aurore Ughetto aq, Eric Van Belle e, Eric Bonnefoy ar, Khaldoun Kuteifan asGraphical abstract |
Abstract |
The last specific international European recommendations regarding the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) regardless of the etiology were issued over 10 years ago. We present herein recommendations for the management of CS in adults, developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system by an expert group of from the French Intensive Care Society [Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF)] and the French Society of Cardiology [Société Française de Cardiologie (SFC)], with the participation of the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)], and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery [Société Française de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardio-Vasculaire (SFCTCV)].
The recommendations covered six fields of application: CS teams and expert centers, symptomatic medical management, etiological management, organ support, temporary circulatory support and de-escalation and early post-CS management. Twenty-three “Patient Intervention Comparator Outcome” (PICO) questions were identified, leading to 41 recommendations regarding management of CS in adult patients. Seven recommendations were scored with high level of evidence (Grade 1), 11 with moderate level of evidence (Grade 2) and 17 with low level of evidence (Expert opinion). In 6 cases, the experts were not able to give an answer. All of the recommendations obtained strong agreement from the expert committee.
The experts highlight the fact that optimal management of CS requires organization including a structured, multidisciplinary shock team and regional referral network, applying standardized protocols for diagnosis and staging. Early etiological treatment—such as culprit-lesion revascularization or urgent valve intervention—is central to improve outcomes. Hemodynamic support should prioritize norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor and privilege selective inotrope use. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (Impella, VA-ECMO) should be reserved for carefully selected patients following discussion by the expert team.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : ACS, AS, AR, BAV, BiVAD, CABG, CS, GRADE, HF, HFNC, IABP, ICU, IMV, LVAD, MACE, m-AFP, MI, MR, M-TEER, NIV, NSTEMI, PCI, PEEP, PICO, RCT, RRT, SCAI, STEMI, SAVR, TAVR, TH, t-MCS, VA-ECMO, VO2
Keywords : Cardiogenic shock, Guidelines, Temporary circulatory support, Heart team
Plan
Vol 16
Article 100038- 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
