Clinical diagnosis of spinal metastases: a narrative review - 11/04/26
, Rayan Fawaz a, b, Philemon Robert a, b, Mathilde Fouet a, François-Léopold Maison a, Bogdan Ene a, Jean-Marc Delmas aHighlights |
• | Clinical diagnosis remains central despite widespread MRI availability. |
• | Pain patterns and early neurological signs guide timely spinal metastasis detection. |
• | Despite more common differential diagnosis, in frail and comorbid patients, spinal metastases should be evoked first. |
• | Structured clinical assessment underpins NOMS, SINS and multidisciplinary decisions. |
Abstract |
Spinal metastases are a frequent and disabling manifestation of systemic cancer. Pain, neurological compromise, and functional decline dominate the clinical picture, yet diagnostic delays remain common despite widespread MRI availability. To synthesize contemporary evidence on the clinical diagnosis of spinal metastases, emphasizing context‑dependent reasoning, characteristic clinical patterns, key differential diagnosis,
and the central role of structured clinical examination. The review integrates recent epidemiological data, highlighting the influence of tumor histology, frailty, and treatment‑related toxicities on presentation. Pain phenotypes, radicular and myelopathic signs, and systemic symptoms are detailed, along with common mimickers such as osteoporotic fractures, spondylodiscitis, spinal hematoma, and chemotherapy‑induced peripheral neuropathy. The manuscript underscores the diagnostic and prognostic value of standardized neurological assessment (Frankel,ASIA), mechanical evaluation (SINS), and global patient appraisal through performance status and frailty measures. Historical prognostic scores (Tokuhashi, Tomita, Bauer, OSRI) and contemporary frameworks such as NOMS are discussed as structured extensions of clinical examination. Strengthening clinical examination skills and integrating neurological, mechanical, oncologic, and systemic dimensions are essential to reduce diagnostic delays and guide personalized, multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Spinal metastases, Clinical diagnosis, Neurological assessment, Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression, Differential diagnosis
Plan
Vol 72 - N° 3
Article 101810- mai 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
