A Comparative Study of Nintedanib versus Conventional Drugs in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Intestinal Fibrosis - 25/07/26
Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder
Highlights |
• | This study compared the anti-fibrotic effects of nintedanib versus conventional therapy in a mouse model of intestinal fibrosis. |
• | Nintedanib significantly attenuated intestinal fibrosis and reduced inflammatory infiltration, outperforming conventional treatment. |
• | Mechanistically, nintedanib exerted its therapeutic effect by downregulating the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. |
• | Our findings highlight nintedanib as a promising novel anti-fibrotic therapy for intestinal fibrosis. |
Abstract |
Background |
Intestinal fibrosis is a severe complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with limited effective therapeutic interventions. Nintedanib, a multi-target kinase inhibitor, exerts well-characterized antifibrotic activity in pulmonary fibrosis and may serve as a candidate agent for IBD-related intestinal fibrosis.
Objective |
To compare the anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic efficacy of nintedanib with prednisolone and sulfasalazine in a DSS-induced mouse intestinal fibrosis model.
Methods |
Forty-eight C57BL/6 mice were randomly allocated to four DSS-treated intervention groups (12 mice per group: Group A prednisolone, Group B sulfasalazine, Group C nintedanib, Group D normal saline), plus a normal untreated control Group E (n=7). Intestinal fibrosis was induced via four cycles of intermittent 2% DSS drinking water. On Day 26 prior to drug administration, five mice from each group were randomly euthanized for baseline detection to verify successful model establishment. The remaining mice received 14 consecutive days of intragastric treatment. Measured endpoints included body weight recovery, disease activity index (DAI), colon morphological parameters, serum TGF-β and TNF-α levels, and collagen deposition quantified via Masson’s trichrome staining.
Results |
Group C achieved slightly higher body weight recovery (19.6±1.4%) than Group A (18.7±0.2%) and Group B (19.4±1.5%), while Group D only recovered 3.4±0.9% (P<0.001). Nintedanib treatment significantly improved colon length and reduced colon weight compared with the two conventional drugs, though colon length in Group C was still markedly shorter than that of normal mice. Serum TGF-β and TNF-α were reduced more substantially in Group C; however, cytokine concentrations remained 2–3 times higher than baseline values of healthy animals and failed to return to normal levels. Masson staining revealed that collagen deposition in Group C decreased by roughly 10% relative to Groups A and B (25±3.2% vs 35±4.2%, 34±3.8%). Currently, there is no unified gold-standard threshold for evaluating antifibrotic efficacy in preclinical intestinal fibrosis models, and relevant quantitative criteria vary widely across published studies.
Conclusion |
In this DSS-induced colitis model, nintedanib produced modest anti-inflammatory and collagen-reducing effects compared with prednisolone and sulfasalazine used in this study. These preclinical preliminary results warrant further research to evaluate nintedanib as a potential therapeutic candidate for fibrostenotic Crohn’s disease.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Nintedanib, Intestinal fibrosis, Inflammatory bowel disease, Prednisolone, Sulfasalazine, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Antifibrotic therapy
Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

