Access to and perceived value of post-ICU follow-up: an international cross-sectional survey of ICU professionals and adult critical illness survivors - 02/09/26
, Susannah Leaver c, Kristina Fuest d, Victoria Metaxa e, Guy François f, Bernard Lambermont a, Stefan J. Schaller g, h, Richard Rezar i, Margo M.C. van Mol j, Michael Beil k
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Highlights |
• | Access to information about post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and to post-ICU follow-up remains inconsistent, with marked international heterogeneity, despite strong interest among ICU survivors and the perceived usefulness of such information and services. |
• | Patients primarily value relational and informational aspects of post-ICU follow-up, such as being listened to and gaining a better understanding of their ICU experience, rather than symptom resolution alone. This highlights a gap between patient- and clinician-centred outcomes. |
• | There is a clear need for structured guidance, training, and standardisation, with scientific societies playing a pivotal role in supporting education, guideline development, and coordinated ICU survivorship care. |
Abstract |
Background |
Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is a frequent and debilitating consequence of critical illness, yet access to structured post-ICU follow-up remains inconsistent.
Methods |
We conducted an ESICM-endorsed, international, cross-sectional online survey using two complementary questionnaires to explore the perspectives of ICU healthcare professionals (ICU-HP) and adult ICU survivors (ICU-S), disseminated through ESICM communication channels, professional networks, patient associations, and social media. Both surveys explored post-ICU follow-up practices, access to care, perceived benefits, and unmet needs.
Results |
A total of 276 ICU-HP from 242 hospitals across 43 countries and 106 ICU-S from 47 ICUs across 6 countries participated in the survey. Post-ICU follow-up was reported to be available by 45% of ICUs and accessed by 58.5% of patients. Among ICU survivors, 55.7% reported having received information about PICS, while 86.2% of those not informed indicated it would have been useful. Follow-up practices showed marked heterogeneity in patient selection, timing, content, and duration. Among patients who had access to post-ICU follow-up, screening of all three core PICS domains (physical, cognitive and psychological functions) was performed in only 40.7% of cases. Nevertheless, 56.4% reported feeling better following follow-up, mainly due to perceived support and improved understanding of their condition. Among ICU-HPs offering follow-up, 55.1% reported that this activity had led to changes in clinical practice within their ICU, and 97.4% expressed intent to continue their programs although limited training opportunities and a lack of formal guidance were reported by a substantial proportion of respondents.
Conclusions |
This survey demonstrates inconsistent access to post-ICU follow-up and information about PICS, despite the perceived value of post-ICU follow-up among both ICU-S and ICU-HP. Improving post-ICU care will require dedicated training and structured guidelines, highlighting the key role of scientific societies in ICU survivorship care.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Post-intensive care syndrome, Follow-up, Survivorship, Patient-centred care, Health service research
Abbreviations : CHERRIES, ESICM, ESPEN, GP, GPICS, HP, HSRO, ICU, NICE, PICS, PICS-F, S
Plan
Vol 16
Article 100141- 2026 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Consensus statement for managing patients with ARDS in low-resource settings: a Delphi study
- Pedja Kovacevic, Jesús Villar, Boris Tomic, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Giacomo Grasselli, Luigi Camporota, Marlies Ostermann, Ivan Palibrk, Rajesh Mishra, Sasa Dragic, Jose Diaz-Gomez, Danica Momcicevic, Ali Ait Hssain, Biljana Zlojutro, Jihad Mallat, Milka Jandric, Owoniya Temitope, Roman Zahorec, Omar Shahed, Mohamed Boussarsar, F. Joachim Meyer, Ahmed Mukhtar, Marko Kutlesa, Vladimir Krajinovic, John Laffey, Radmilo Jankovic, Samir Jaber, Dejan Markovic, Oluwayemisi Esther Ekor, Rotimi Muyiwa, Rihard Knafelj, Matija Jurjevic, Natasa Milivojevic, Ahmed El Masry, Jasminka Persec, Anusha Cherian, Younes Aissaoui, Oguz Kilickaya, Kent Doi, Daniel Lovric, Wael Alqassem, Natasa Gocic, Aderonke Adesiyan, Reuben Okioma, Ayalew Zewdie, Mumbere Kigayi Jean Pierre, Subhash Acharya, Ognjen Gajic
- Prognostic impact of Candida spp. isolation and early antifungal therapy in ICU patients with peritonitis: A multicenter cohort study
- Mattéo Mauget, Charly Angebault, Melchior Bardoul, Pierre Fillâtre, Pierre Bouju, Agathe Delbove, Guillaume Rieul, Yannick Fedun, Renaud Prével, Jean-Pierre Gangneux, Yoann Launey, Florian Reizine
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.