S'abonner

Heterogeneous associations between cigarette and e-cigarette use patterns and chronic disease burden: A population-based study - 23/09/26

Doi : 10.1016/j.jeph.2026.203800 
Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi a, b, c, ⁎ , Giulio Cantone d, Duaa Abdullah Bafail e, Isaac Olushola Ogunkola f, g, Venera Tomaselli h, i, j, Ahmed K. Shukri k, Najim Z. Alshahrani k, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno l, Riccardo Polosa b, h, m
a College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, 40 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RT, Scotland, United Kingdom 
b Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy 
c Global Health Focus, Kigali, Rwanda 
d Department of Law, Business, and Sociology, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy 
e Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 
f Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom 
g Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom 
h Center of Excellence for the Acceleration of HArm Reduction (CoEHAR), University of Catania, Italy 
i Department of Economics and Business, University of Catania, Catania, Italy 
j IRCCS Oasi Research Institute, Troina, Italy 
k Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 
l Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom 
m Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, "Kore" University of Enna, Enna, Italy 

⁎ Corresponding author.

Highlights

•
Using Health Survey for England 2022 data, we compared long-standing condition burden across six mutually exclusive nicotine-use groups.
•
After adjustment, exclusive cigarette smokers, former smokers, current e-cigarette users with a smoking history, and dual users had higher odds of any long-standing condition than never users.
•
Multimorbidity followed a similar pattern, with the highest adjusted odds among dual users and current e-cigarette users with a smoking history.
•
Current e-cigarette users who had never smoked did not show clear evidence of higher morbidity, but estimates were imprecise due to small sample size.
•
Mental health, respiratory, and musculoskeletal conditions showed the most robust disease-specific associations after false discovery rate correction.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Background

Cigarette smoking is a major contributor to chronic disease and multimorbidity, but less is known about how morbidity burden varies across contemporary nicotine-use profiles, particularly among people who use e-cigarettes with and without a history of smoking. This study examined associations between mutually exclusive nicotine-use groups and long-standing condition burden in a population-based sample of adults in England.

Methods

We analysed cross-sectional data from 7625 adults aged ≥16 years in the 2022 Health Survey for England. Participants were classified into six mutually exclusive groups: never users, exclusive cigarette smokers, former smokers, current e-cigarette users who had never smoked, current e-cigarette users who had ever smoked, and dual users. Outcomes included seven self-reported long-standing condition groups, a composite indicator of any condition, and ordinal multimorbidity, defined as 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 condition groups. Survey-weighted logistic and ordered logistic regression models accounted for sampling weight, clustering, and stratification. Adjusted models controlled for age group, sex, ethnicity, area-level deprivation, educational attainment, alcohol consumption, and physical activity.

Results

Compared with never users, adjusted odds of reporting any of the seven long-standing conditions were higher among exclusive cigarette smokers (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.51–2.31), former smokers (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27–1.65), current e-cigarette users who had ever smoked (aOR 2.13, 95% CI 1.61–2.82), and dual users (aOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.59–3.45). Current e-cigarette users who had never smoked did not show clear evidence of higher overall morbidity, but estimates were imprecise (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 0.58–2.63). Similar patterns were observed for ordinal multimorbidity, with higher adjusted odds among exclusive cigarette smokers (aOR 1.84, 95% CI 1.51–2.25), former smokers (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.31–1.68), current e-cigarette users who had ever smoked (aOR 2.14, 95% CI 1.67–2.75), and dual users (aOR 2.27, 95% CI 1.63–3.18), but not among current e-cigarette users who had never smoked (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.57–2.17). Mental health, respiratory, and musculoskeletal conditions showed the most robust disease-specific associations after false discovery rate correction. No disease-specific association involving current e-cigarette users who had never smoked remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions

Morbidity burden was unevenly distributed across nicotine-use groups and was most consistently elevated among adults with current or previous combustible cigarette exposure, including former smokers, dual users, and current e-cigarette users with a smoking history. Current e-cigarette users who had never smoked did not show clear evidence of higher morbidity, but this subgroup was small and estimates were imprecise. Distinguishing smoking history is essential when interpreting the health profiles of people who use e-cigarettes. Longitudinal studies with larger samples of never-smoker e-cigarette users and more detailed exposure histories are needed.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Nicotine use, Cigarette smoking, E-cigarettes, Multimorbidity, Chronic disease burden


Plan


© 2026  The Author(s). Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 74 - N° 6

Article 203800- décembre 2026 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The power of walkability: a study on the relationship between urban design and pedestrian walking time
  • V. Leblanc, D. Brousmiche, A. Hubert, R. Bentegeac, A. Meirhaeghe, P. Amouyel, A. Hamroun, M. Genin, C. Lanier, S. Gabet, L. Dauchet, F. Occelli, V. Gauthier
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Proximal outcomes of the ‘Making every contact count’ (MECC) approach in healthcare settings: a rapid review
  • Sander de Souza, Léo Heran, Asma Fares, Philippe Michel

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.