Optimal stretching dose for improving range of motion in non-athletes and athletes with hamstring shortening: a dose-response meta-analysis - 11/10/26
, Felipe Araya-Quintanilla c, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz a, Miguel Alarcón-Rivera b, Serghio Torreblanca-Vargas d, Héctor Joaquín Gutiérrez Espinoza e, f, Luis Suso-Martí gAbstract |
Background |
Hamstring stretching is widely used to improve range of motion (ROM), but the optimal stretching dose remains unclear.
Objective |
To determine the dose-response relationship between total stretching volume and ROM gains in healthy people with hamstring shortening, whether athletes or non-athletes, differentiating between stretching modalities. The secondary objective was to analyze dose-response patterns for single-session and post-program effects.
Methods |
MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and SCOPUS were searched. Randomized controlled and crossover trials including healthy participants without active musculoskeletal injury and with clinically confirmed hamstring shortening were included. Outcomes were ROM using active knee extension (AKE), passive knee extension (PKE), and straight leg raise (SLR) tests. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled mean differences, and dose-response meta-analyses assessed associations between total stretching time and ROM change. Risk of bias (RoB 2) and certainty (GRADE) were evaluated.
Results |
Eighty-four studies were included (non-athlete, n = 3008; athletes, n = 1059). In non-athletes, static stretching improved AKE (mean differences, MD 9.03°), PKE (MD 8.44°), and SLR (MD 12.11°) vs no intervention. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) improved AKE vs no intervention (MD 10.10°) and showed a small advantage over static stretching (MD 3.18°). In athletes, static stretching improved AKE vs no intervention (MD 9.00°). Dose-response curves were nonlinear. For static stretching, a brief single-session dose (1.5 min) did not exceed the minimal detectable change (12°) for AKE. In contrast, repeated stretching delivered over at least 1 week, with a cumulative volume of 70 min, was more likely to exceed this threshold. Most studies had high/some concerns risk of bias, yielding very low-to-high certainty across outcomes.
Conclusion |
ROM gains followed a nonlinear, modality-specific dose-response pattern in people with hamstring shortening. Repeated stretching programs lasting at least 1 week were more likely than a brief single session to produce meaningful ROM improvements.
PROSPERO ID |
CRD42024535372.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Stretching, Hamstring shortening, Hamstring stretching, Dose-response, Exercise prescription
List of abbreviations : AKE, CI, GRADE, LFK, MDC, MD, MOOSE, PICOS, PKE, PNF, PRISMA, PROSPERO, RCT, RoB 2, ROM, SD, SLR
Plan
Vol 69 - N° 7
Article 102153- octobre 2026 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Machine learning-based triage of non-red-flag low back pain in national-level collegiate athletes: A cross-sectional study in Taiwan
- Hung-Chun Huang, Pei-Hsi Chou, Kung-Che Lee, I-Hua Chu, Ing-Jer Huang, Jing-Min Liang, Wen-Lan Wu
- Psychometric properties of the System Usability Scale for digital rehabilitation technologies: a COSMIN systematic review
- Poeiti Abi Saab, Soléane Vielotte, Raphaël Vincent, Claudine Auger, Karine Latulippe, Jean-Christophe Daviet, Stéphane Mandigout
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?