Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium - 19/08/11
, Joseph Hasson, MD, Anat Wengier, MD, Ronen Gold, MD, Avital Skornick-Rapaport, MD, Joseph B. Lessing, MD, David Gordon, MDRésumé |
Objective |
We sought to assess the modern prevalence and risk factors for third- and fourth-degree perineal tears.
Study Design |
The study population comprised 38,252 women who delivered in one medical center, from January 2005 through December 2009, and met the following inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancy, vertex presentation, and vaginal delivery. Of these, 96 women (0.25%) sustained third- or fourth-degree perineal tears. Maternal and obstetric variables were compared between women with vs without severe perineal tears.
Results |
Five variables were found to be statistically significant independent risk factors: Asian ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 8.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2–18.9), primiparity (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5–3.7), persistent occipito posterior (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1–4.5), vacuum delivery (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6–4.6), and heavier birthweight (OR, 1.001; 95% CI, 1–1.001).
Conclusion |
Severe perineal tears are uncommon in modern obstetric practice. Significant risk factors are Asian ethnicity, primiparity, persistent occipito posterior, vacuum delivery, and heavier birthweight.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : delivery, labor, prevalence, risk factors, severe perineal tears
Plan
| Cite this article as: Groutz A, Hasson J, Wengier A, et al. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears: prevalence and risk factors in the third millennium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:347.e1-4. |
Vol 204 - N° 4
P. 347.e1-347.e4 - avril 2011 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
