Peanut oral immunotherapy modifies IgE and IgG4 responses to major peanut allergens - 27/12/12
, Jing Lin, PhD b, Michael Kulis, PhD a, Abstract |
Background |
Patients with peanut allergy have highly stable pathologic antibody repertoires to the immunodominant B-cell epitopes of the major peanut allergens Ara h 1 to 3.
Objective |
We used a peptide microarray technique to analyze the effect of treatment with peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) on such repertoires.
Methods |
Measurements of total peanut-specific IgE (psIgE) and peanut-specific IgG4 (psIgG4) were made with CAP-FEIA. We analyzed sera from 22 patients with OIT and 6 control subjects and measured serum specific IgE and IgG4 binding to epitopes of Ara h 1 to 3 using a high-throughput peptide microarray technique. Antibody affinity was measured by using a competitive peptide microarray, as previously described.
Results |
At baseline, psIgE and psIgG4 diversity was similar between patients and control subjects, and there was broad variation in epitope recognition. After a median of 41 months of OIT, polyclonal psIgG4 levels increased from a median of 0.3 μg/mL (interquartile range [25% to 75%], 0.1-0.43 μg/mL) at baseline to 10.5 μg/mL (interquartile range [25% to 75%], 3.95-45.48 μg/mL; P < .0001) and included de novo specificities. psIgE levels were reduced from a median baseline of 85.45 kUA/L (23.05-101.0 kUA/L) to 7.75 kUA/L (2.58-30.55 kUA/L, P < .0001). Affinity was unaffected. Although the psIgE repertoire contracted in most OIT-treated patients, several subjects generated new IgE specificities, even as the total psIgE level decreased. Global epitope-specific shifts from IgE to IgG4 binding occurred, including at an informative epitope of Ara h 2.
Conclusion |
OIT differentially alters Ara h 1 to 3 binding patterns. These changes are variable between patients, are not observed in control subjects, and include a progressive polyclonal increase in IgG4 levels, with concurrent reduction in IgE amount and diversity.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Peanut allergy, oral immunotherapy, IgE, IgG4, peptide microarray, epitope, B cell, antibody affinity
Abbreviations used : FDR, HSA, OIT, PBS-T, psIgE, psIgG4
Plan
| Supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. |
|
| Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: B. P. Vickery has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); the American Lung Association; Cephalon; the Foundation of the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Thrasher Research Fund and has received consultancy fees from Mead Johnson. M. Kulis has received research support from the NIH/NIAID. S. M. Jones has received research support from the National Peanut Board, the NIH, and the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network; is on the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network medical advisory board; has received lecture fees from Abbott Nutrition International, the Kentucky Society for Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, the New England Allergy Society, the ACAAI, Indiana University Medical School and Riley Children’s Hospital, the Spanish Society of Allergy & Clinical Immunology (Madrid, Spain), and the Oregon Allergy Asthma & Immunology Society; is on the NIAID Safety Monitoring Committee and the Arkansas Medicaid Drug Review Committee; and participated in ad hoc review for the NIAID Study Section. H. A. Sampson has received research support and travel support from the NIAID; is on the Danone Scientific advisory board; has received consultancy fees from Allertein Therapeutics and Food Allergy Initiative; is employed by Mount Sinai Medical School; receives royalties from Elsevier-Wiley; and is a 42.5% owner of Herbs Springs, LLC. A. W. Burks has received research support and travel support from the NIH/NIAID; is on the board for the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI), the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network, the US Food and Drug Administration, the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and the NIH/HAI; has received consultancy fees from Dannon Co Probiotics, Exploramed Development, Intelliject, McNeil Nutritionals, Merck & Co, Novartis, Nutricia, Pfizer, Portola Pharmaceuticals, and Schering-Plough; is employed by Duke University Medical Center and UNC North Carolina Children’s Hospital; has received research support from the Food Allergy & Anaphylaxis Network, the Food Allergy Initiative, the NIH, the National Peanut Board, Scientific Hospital Supplies (Nutricia North America), and the Wallace Research Foundation; has received royalties from UpToDate; has received payment for developing educational presentations from Current Views; has stock/stock options in Allertein and MastCell; and has received travel support from the AAAAI, the European Academy of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, and the ACAAI. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 131 - N° 1
P. 128 - janvier 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
