How We Understand Hallucinations (HUSH) - 09/06/15
Résumé |
Introduction |
Evidence suggests that the subjective experience of AVHs cannot be explained by any of the existing cognitive models,[1] highlighting the obvious need to properly investigate the actual, lived experience of AVHs, and derive models/theories that fit the complexity of this.
Objectives |
Via phenomenological interviews and ethnographic diary methods, we aim to gain a deeper insight into the experience of AVHs.
Aims |
To explore the phenomenological quality of AVHs, as they happen/reveal themselves to consciousness, [2] [3] without relying on existing suppositions.
Methods |
Participants with First Episode Psychosis were recruited from the Birmingham Early Intervention Service (EIS), BSMHFT. In-depth ’walking interviews’ were carried out with each participant, together with standardised assessment measures of voices. Prior to interviews, participants were asked to complete a dairy and take photographs, further capturing aspects of their AVH experiences.
Results |
20 participants have completed interviews to date. Emerging themes cover the form and quality of voices (i.e. as being separate to self, imposing, compelling etc.), and participants’ understanding and management of these experiences.
Conclusions |
Authentic descriptions gleaned from participants have the potential to increase our understanding of the relationship between the phenomenology and neurobiology of AVHs and, in turn, the experience as a whole.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Vol 30 - N° S1
P. 872 - mars 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
