Impact of Respiratory Effort Parameters on Clinical Outcomes in Respiratory Failure Patients (Effort-I): A Prospective Observational Study - 27/06/26
, Touchapong Taksinwarajarn b
, Detajin Junhasavasdikul b
, Yuda Sutherasan b
, Pongdhep Theerawit a, ⁎ 
Abstract |
Background |
Excessive or insufficient respiratory drive and inspiratory effort during mechanical ventilation may worsen outcomes through patient self-inflicted lung injury or diaphragm disuse. We evaluated whether bedside measures of respiratory drive and effort during the first 48 h of ventilation were associated with outcomes in critically ill adults with acute respiratory failure.
Methods |
In this single-center, prospective, observational study, adults aged 18–75 years with acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation and a PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio > 150 mmHg were enrolled within 24 h of ICU admission. Airway occlusion pressure at 100 ms (P 0.1 ) and occlusion pressure (P occ ) were measured at baseline and at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Calculated respiratory muscle pressure (P mus ) and calculated transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔP L ) were calculated from P occ. Median values over the first 48 h represented exposure. The primary outcome was 28-day ventilator-free days (VFDs). Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, oxygenation changes, and correlations with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores. Multivariable Poisson and Cox regression analyses were performed.
Results |
A total of 206 patients were included. Patients within prespecified preferred ranges (P 0.1 1.5–3.5 cmH 2 O, calculated P mus 5–10 cmH 2 2O, and calculated ΔP L ≤20 cmH 2 O) had more 28-day VFDs than those with low or high values. In multivariable Poisson regression, low and high P 0.1 , low calculated P mus , and high calculated ΔP L were independently associated with fewer VFDs. In multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, immunocompromised status, peak airway pressure, and APACHE II score, calculated ΔP L > 20 cmH 2 O was independently associated with increased 28-day mortality (hazard ratio 6.57, 95% confidence interval 2.29–18.86; P < 0.001). Both low and high P 0.1 were also independently associated with mortality (hazard ratios 3.75 and 4.81, respectively). Oxygenation improved in patients with preferred effort levels, whereas ΔP L > 20 cmH 2 O was associated with new-onset hypoxemia. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores correlated most strongly with calculated P mus (r = 0.76), followed by P0.1 (r = 0.50) and ΔPL (r = 0.43).
Conclusions |
Early respiratory drive and inspiratory effort within preferred physiological ranges were associated with more VFDs and lower mortality. Calculated ΔP L showed the strongest association with adverse outcomes, supporting bedside monitoring of drive and effort during assisted ventilation.
Trial Registration |
NCT06433076. Registered 29 May 2024, retrospectively registered.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Respiratory effort, Mechanical ventilation, P 0.1 Transpulmonary driving pressure , Ventilator-free days
Abbreviations : APACHE II, ARDS, BMI, BPS, CI, ECMO, FiO₂, HR, ICU, ILD, IRR, OR, P 0.1 , PBW, PEEP, PF ratio, PIP, P mus , P occ , P-SILI, PTP, RASS, SD, SOFA, VFDs, VIF, ΔP L
Plan
Vol 16
Article 100103- 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
