S'abonner

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Imputing Response Rates for First-Line Psychological Treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Youth - 28/01/26

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.12.014 
Katie Lofthouse, BA(Hons), PhD a,  : Candidate, Alana Davies, MSc b, Joanne Hodgekins, PhD, ClinPsyD a, Richard Meiser-Stedman, PhD a
a University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom 
b Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Drayton High Road, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom 

Correspondence to Katie Lofthouse, BA(Hons), PhD Candidate, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Therapies, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ Norfolk United Kingdom

Abstract

Objective

Meta-analyses assessing psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in youth have demonstrated their effectiveness using standardized mean differences. Imputation of response rates (ie, 50% or greater reduction in symptoms) may facilitate easier interpretation for clinicians.

Method

We searched 4 databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PTSDPubs, and Web of Science) and screened 1,654 records to include 60 randomized controlled trials (52 trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy [TF-CBT], 8 eye movement desensitization [EMDR]) with a total of 5,113 participants, comparing psychological therapies for PTSD against control conditions in youth. Data from randomized controlled trials of EMDR and TF-CBT for PTSD were used to impute response rates, establishing how many patients display 50% reduction, 20% reduction, and reliable improvement and deterioration (using reliable change indices) in PTSD and depression.

Results

The proportion of youth exhibiting a 50% reduction in PTSD symptoms was 0.48 (95% CI = 0.41-0.55) for TF-CBT, 0.30 (0.24-0.37) for EMDR, and 0.46 (0.39-0.52) for all psychological therapies, compared to 0.20 (0.16-0.24) for youth in control conditions. Reliable improvement was displayed by 0.53 (0.45-0.61; TF-CBT 0.55 [0.46-0.64], EMDR 0.42[0.30-0.55]) of youth receiving psychological therapies, compared to 0.25 (0.20-0.30) of youth in control conditions. Reliable deterioration was seen in 0.01 (0.01-0.02) of youth receiving psychological therapies, compared to 0.13 (0.08-0.20) of youth in control conditions. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the included studies.

Conclusion

Psychological therapies, in particular TF-CBT, for young people with PTSD are effective and unlikely to cause deterioration, with around half of youth receiving TF-CBT exhibiting 50% symptom reduction.

Plain language summary

In this study, the authors analyzed data from 57 randomized controlled trials involving over 5,000 youth assessing psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Forty-eight percent of youth with PTSD who received trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) and 30% of youth who received eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) exhibited 50% symptom reduction after treatment, compared to 20% of youth in control conditions. Deterioration was seen in 1% of youth receiving TF-CBT or EMDR, compared to 13% of youth in control conditions.

Clinical guidance

• Psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in youth, like trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing, can be helpful in symptom reduction and have low likelihood of causing deterioration of symptoms.

Study registration information

Imputing response rates from randomised controlled trials of first-line psychological treatments for PTSD in children and adolescents; a systematic review and meta-analysis; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022304592

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : PTSD, youth, meta-analysis, review, therapy


Plan


 The authors have reported no funding for this work.
 Data Sharing: Data collected for the study will not be made available to others.
 Disclosure: Katie Lofthouse has received doctoral funding from Norwich Medical School. Joanne Hodgekins has received funding from National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), and the Wellcome Trust. Richard Meiser-Stedman has received funding from the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Research and the UK Medical Research Council, has served on the Research and Implementation Board of the Children and War Foundation (no financial gain from their involvement) and is a member of the UK Trauma Council (no financial gain from their involvement). Alana Davies has reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.


© 2025  American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 65 - N° 2

P. 187-205 - février 2026 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Systematic Umbrella Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of Physical Activity in Improving Depression and Anxiety in Children and Adolescents
  • Ben Singh, Hunter Bennett, Aaron Miatke, Dorothea Dumuid, Rachel Curtis, Ty Ferguson, Jacinta Brinsley, Kimberley Szeto, Emily Eglitis, Mason Zhou, Catherine E.M. Simpson, Jasmine M. Petersen, Joseph Firth, Carol A. Maher
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Predictors of Relapsing, Recurrent, and Chronic Depression in Young People
  • Scott D. Tagliaferri, Laura K.M. Han, Muskan Khetan, Joshua Nguyen, Connie Markulev, Simon Rice, Susan M. Cotton, Michael Berk, Enda M. Byrne, Debra Rickwood, Christopher G. Davey, Peter Koval, Aswin Ratheesh, Patrick D. McGorry, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Lianne Schmaal

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.