S'abonner

Association between ovarian stimulators with or without intrauterine insemination, and assisted reproductive technologies on multiple births - 25/09/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.028 
Sonia Chaabane, BSc a, b, Odile Sheehy, MSc a, Patricia Monnier, MD, PhD c, e, François Bissonnette, MD, FRCSC f, Jacquetta M. Trasler, MD, PhD d, g, William Fraser, MD, MSc, FRCSC h, Anick Bérard, PhD a, b,
a Research Center and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
b Faculties of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
c University Reproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
d Departments of Pediatrics, Human Genetics, and Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
e Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
f OVO Fertility Clinic, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
g Research Institute, Montreal Children’s Hospital of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
h Dr Fraser is now affiliated with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University of Sherbrooke and not with the Research Center CHU Sainte-Justine 

Corresponding author: Anick Bérard, PhD.

Abstract

Objective

We sought to quantify the risk of multiple births associated with the use of different modalities of medically assisted reproduction.

Study Design

We conducted a case-control study using a birth cohort from 2006 through 2009. This cohort was built with the linkage of data obtained by a self-administered questionnaire and medical, hospital, pharmaceutical, birth, and death databases in Quebec. Cases were pregnancies resulting in multiple live births (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes). Each case was matched, on maternal age and year of delivery, with 3 singleton pregnancies (controls) randomly selected among all Quebec singleton pregnancies. Data on the use of different fertility treatments were collected by a self-administered questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression models, adjusted for body mass index, number of previous live births, ethnicity, family income, place of residence, marital status, subfertility, reduction of embryos, diabetes, metformin treatment, folic acid supplementation, and lifestyle factors, were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs). We evaluated the associations between each type of fertility treatment (ovarian stimulators used alone, intrauterine insemination [IUI] used with ovarian stimulation, and assisted reproductive technologies [ART]) and the risk of multiple births.

Results

A total of 1407 cases of multiple births and 3580 controls were analyzed. More than half of multiple births following medically assisted reproduction (53.6%) occurred among women having used ovarian stimulation with or without IUI. The use of ovarian stimulators alone and IUI with ovarian stimulation increase the risk of multiple births (adjusted OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 3.2–6.4; and adjusted OR, 9.32; 95% CI, 5.60–15.50, respectively) compared to spontaneous conception. The use of invasive ART was associated with a greatly increased risk of multiple births. Among only the 465 women who used medically assisted reproduction for conception, the use of IUI with ovarian stimulation was associated with an increased risk of multiple births (adjusted OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.12–3.49) when compared to ovarian stimulators used alone. Invasive ART were associated with an increased risk of multiple births (adjusted OR, 6.81; 95% CI, 3.72–12.49) when compared to ovarian stimulators used alone.

Conclusion

Although the risk of multiple births associated with invasive ART can be decreased by elective implementing of single embryo transfer, special attention should be paid to the greatly increased risk associated with ovarian stimulation used alone or with IUI.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : assisted reproduction, case-control study, epidemiology, in vitro fertilization, intrauterine insemination, ovarian stimulation, risk of multiple births


Plan


 This study was supported by the Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and a postgraduate bursary from the CIHR-Quebec Training Network in Perinatal Research. A.B. is the holder of a research chair on medications and pregnancy from the Fonds du Québec – Santé. The funding source had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or drafting of the manuscript.
 F.B. is the director of the OVO Fertility Clinic. The other authors report no conflict of interest.
 Cite this article as: Chaabane S, Sheehy O, Monnier P, et al. Association between ovarian stimulators with or without intrauterine insemination, and assisted reproductive technologies on multiple births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:511.e1-14.


© 2015  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 213 - N° 4

P. 511.e1-511.e14 - octobre 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Postpartum contraceptive use among women with a recent preterm birth
  • Cheryl L. Robbins, Sherry L. Farr, Lauren B. Zapata, Denise V. D’Angelo, William M. Callaghan
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Insertion characteristics of intrauterine devices in adolescents and young women: success, ancillary measures, and complications
  • Stephanie B. Teal, Sarah E. Romer, Lisa M. Goldthwaite, Marissa G. Peters, David W. Kaplan, Jeanelle Sheeder

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.