Identifying Barriers and Practical Solutions to Conducting Site-Based Research in North America : Exploring Acute Heart Failure Trials As a Case Study - 28/09/15
, Robert J. Mentz, MD a, b, Arun Krishnamoorthy, MD a, b, Stephen J. Greene, MD a, Harry W. Severance, MD cRésumé |
Although the prognosis of ambulatory heart failure (HF) has improved dramatically there have been few advances in the management of acute HF (AHF). Despite regional differences in patient characteristics, background therapy, and event rates, AHF clinical trial enrollment has transitioned from North America and Western Europe to Eastern Europe, South America, and Asia-Pacific where regulatory burden and cost of conducting research may be less prohibitive. It is unclear if the results of clinical trials conducted outside of North America are generalizable to US patient populations. This article uses AHF as a paradigm and identifies barriers and practical solutions to successfully conducting site-based research in North America.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Acute heart failure, Clinical trials, Site-based research
Plan
| Disclosures: Dr R.J. Mentz receives research support from the NIH, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, Novartis, Otsuka, and ResMed; honoraria from Novartis, Thoratec, and HeartWare; and has served on an advisory board for Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr A. Krishnamoorthy reports working on projects funded by research grants to the Duke Clinical Research Institute from the NIH, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, and Maquet and support to attend educational conferences from HeartWare and Medtronic. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. |
Vol 11 - N° 4
P. 581-589 - octobre 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
